Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorEndres, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorLaidlaw, Anita Helen
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-28T12:01:03Z
dc.date.available2014-04-28T12:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-20
dc.identifier.citationEndres , J & Laidlaw , A H 2009 , ' Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study ' , BMC Medical Education , vol. 9 , no. 47 , 47 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-47en
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 3409044
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 2cf49f6d-bc10-4d3d-ae0b-4039c8aa964f
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 68749104763
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-1214-4100/work/59698700
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/4630
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients provide emotional cues during consultations which may be verbal or non-verbal. Many studies focus on patient verbal cues as predictors of physicians' ability to recognize and address patient needs but this project focused on non-verbal cues in the form of facial micro-expressions. This pilot study investigated first year medical students' (n = 75) identified as being either good or poor communicators abilities to detect emotional micro-expressions before and after training using the Micro Expression Training Tool (METT) http://www.mettonline.com. Methods: The sample consisted of 24 first year medical students, 9 were from the lowest performance quartile in a communication skills OS CE (Objective Structured Clinical Exam) station and 15 were from the highest performance quartile. These students completed the METT individually, recording pre- and post-assessment scores. Students were also invited to provide their views on the training. Results: No difference in pre-assessment scores was found between the lowest and highest quartile groups (P = 0.797). Af ter training, students in the high quartile showed significant improvement in the recognition of facial micro-expressions (P = 0.014). The lowest quartile students showed no improvement (P = 0.799). Conclusion: In conclusion, this pilot study showed there was no difference between the ability of medical undergraduate students assessed as being good communicators and those assessed as poor communicators to identify facial micro-expressions. But, the study did highlight that those students demonstrating good general clinical communication benefited from the training aspect of the METT, whereas low performing students did not gain. Why this should be the case is not clear and further investigation should be carried out to determine why lowest quartile students did not benefit.
dc.format.extent6
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Medical Educationen
dc.rights© 2009 Endres and Laidlaw; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citeden
dc.subjectMedical educationen
dc.subjectFacial expressionen
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectR Medicine (General)en
dc.subjectL Education (General)en
dc.subject.lccR1en
dc.subject.lccL1en
dc.titleMicro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot studyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Higher Education Researchen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-47
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749104763&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6920-9-47.pdfen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record