Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorTakahashi, T.
dc.contributor.authorMcDougall, C.
dc.contributor.authorTroschianko, J.
dc.contributor.authorChen, W-C.
dc.contributor.authorNagarajan, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorShimeld, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorFerrier, David Ellard Keith
dc.identifier.citationTakahashi , T , McDougall , C , Troschianko , J , Chen , W-C , Nagarajan , A J , Shimeld , S M & Ferrier , D E K 2009 , ' An EST screen from the annelid Pomatoceros lamarckii reveals patterns of gene loss and gain in animals. ' , BMC Evolutionary Biology , vol. 9 , 240 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 462370
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: d3cafb6c-0064-444c-bc3b-a9656baed4cc
dc.identifier.otherstandrews_research_output: 31697
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 70350294672
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3247-6233/work/36423835
dc.descriptionBBSRC. CM was funded by the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission and AJ-N was funded by a Dorothy Hodgkin Postgraduate Award.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Since the drastic reorganisation of the phylogeny of the animal kingdom into three major clades of bilaterians; Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa and Deuterostomia, it became glaringly obvious that the selection of model systems with extensive molecular resources was heavily biased to wards only two of these three clades, namely the Ecdysozoa and Deuterostomia. Increasing efforts have been put towards redressing this imbalance in recent years, and one of the principal phyla in the vanguardof this endeavour is the Annelida. Results: In the context of this effort we here report our characterisation of an Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) screen in the serpulid annelid, Pomatoceros lamarckii. We have sequenced over 5,000 ESTs which consolidate into over 2,000 sequences (clusters and singletons). These sequences are used to build phylogenetic trees to estimate relative branch lengths amongst different taxa and, by comparison to genomic data from other animals, patterns of gene retention and loss are deduced. Conclusion: The molecular phylogenetic trees including the P. lamarckii sequences extend early observations that polychaetes tend to have relatively short branches in such trees, and hence are useful taxa with which to reconstruct gene family evolution. Also, with the availability of lophotrochozoan data such as that of P. lamarckii, it is now possible to make much more accurate reconstructions of the gene complement of the ancestor of the bilaterians than was previously possible from comparisons of ecdysozoan and deuterostome genomes to no n-bilaterian outgroups. It is clear that the traditional molecular model systems for protostomes (e.g. Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans), which are restricted to the Ecdysozoa, have undergone extensive gene loss during evolution. These ecdysozoan systems, in terms of gene content, are thus more derived from the bilaterian ancestral condition than lophotrochozoan systems likethe polychaetes, and thus cannot be used as good, general representatives of protostome genomes. Currently sequenced insect and nematode genomes are less suitable models for deducing bilaterian ancestral states than lophotrochozoan genomes, despite the array of powerful genetic and mechanistic manipulation techniques in these ecdysozoans. A distinct category of genes that includes those present in non-bilaterians and lophotrochozoans, but which are absent from ecdysozoans and deuterostomes, highlights the need for further lophotrochozoan data to gain a more complete understanding of the gene complement of the bilaterian ancestor.
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.rights© 2009 Takahashi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectQH426 Geneticsen
dc.titleAn EST screen from the annelid Pomatoceros lamarckii reveals patterns of gene loss and gain in animals.en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record