Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMartin-Ordas, Gema
dc.contributor.authorSchumacher, Lena
dc.contributor.authorCall, Josep
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-24T15:01:03Z
dc.date.available2014-04-24T15:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-26
dc.identifier104082965
dc.identifier75c7483a-07e5-4d91-ac85-1f052b968ffc
dc.identifier000313618800046
dc.identifier84871568246
dc.identifier.citationMartin-Ordas , G , Schumacher , L & Call , J 2012 , ' Sequential Tool Use in Great Apes ' , PLoS One , vol. 7 , no. 12 , 52074 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052074en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8597-8336/work/37477791
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4601
dc.description.abstractSequential tool use is defined as using a tool to obtain another non-food object which subsequently itself will serve as a tool to act upon a further ( sub) goal. Previous studies have shown that birds and great apes succeed in such tasks. However, the inclusion of a training phase for each of the sequential steps and the low cost associated with retrieving the longest tools limits the scope of the conclusions. The goal of the experiments presented here was, first to replicate a previous study on sequential tool use conducted on New Caledonian crows and, second, extend this work by increasing the cost of retrieving a tool in order to test tool selectivity of apes. In Experiment 1, we presented chimpanzees, orangutans and bonobos with an out-of-reach reward, two tools that were available but too short to reach the food and four out-of-reach tools differing in functionality. Similar to crows, apes spontaneously used up to 3 tools in sequence to get the reward and also showed a strong preference for the longest out-of reach tool independently of the distance of the food. In Experiment 2, we increased the cost of reaching for the longest out-of reach tool. Now apes used up to 5 tools in sequence to get the reward and became more selective in their choice of the longest tool as the costs of its retrieval increased. The findings of the studies presented here contribute to the growing body of comparative research on tool use.
dc.format.extent15
dc.format.extent585237
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen
dc.subjectCALEDONIAN CROWSen
dc.subjectTASKen
dc.subjectSELECTIVITYen
dc.subjectMONKEYSen
dc.subjectGORILLAen
dc.subjectSOLVEen
dc.titleSequential Tool Use in Great Apesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0052074
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record