Comparing the performances of apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens) in the floating peanut task
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Recently, Mendes et al.  described the use of a liquid tool (water) in captive orangutans. Here, we tested chimpanzees and gorillas for the first time with the same "floating peanut task." None of the subjects solved the task. In order to better understand the cognitive demands of the task, we further tested other populations of chimpanzees and orangutans with the variation of the peanut initially floating or not. Twenty percent of the chimpanzees but none of the orangutans were successful. Additional controls revealed that successful subjects added water only if it was necessary to obtain the nut. Another experiment was conducted to investigate the reason for the differences in performance between the unsuccessful (Experiment 1) and the successful (Experiment 2) chimpanzee populations. We found suggestive evidence for the view that functional fixedness might have impaired the chimpanzees' strategies in the first experiment. Finally, we tested how human children of different age classes perform in an analogous experimental setting. Within the oldest group (8 years), 58 percent of the children solved the problem, whereas in the youngest group (4 years), only 8 percent were able to find the solution.
Hanus , D , Mendes , N , Tennie , C & Call , J 2011 , ' Comparing the performances of apes ( Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus ) and human children ( Homo sapiens ) in the floating peanut task ' , PLoS ONE , vol. 6 , no. 6 , 19555 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019555
© 2010 Hanus et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DescriptionThere is no current external funding source. The internal funders (MPI) had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.