Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCarne, Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorSemple, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorMorrogh-Bernard, Helen
dc.contributor.authorZuberbühler, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Julia
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-22T15:01:02Z
dc.date.available2014-04-22T15:01:02Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-16
dc.identifier.citationCarne , C , Semple , S , Morrogh-Bernard , H , Zuberbühler , K & Lehmann , J 2014 , ' The risk of disease to great apes : Simulating disease spread in orang-utan (pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) and chimpanzee (pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) association networks ' , PLoS One , vol. 9 , no. 4 , e95039 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095039en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 112732126
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8aba99dc-dd47-4c15-aae7-b12e68771139
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 24740263
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84899767574
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000336863900096
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8378-088X/work/64360695
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4583
dc.description.abstractAll great ape species are endangered, and infectious diseases are thought to pose a particular threat to their survival. As great ape species vary substantially in social organisation and gregariousness, there are likely to be differences in susceptibility to disease types and spread. Understanding the relation between social variables and disease is therefore crucial for implementing effective conservation measures. Here, we simulate the transmission of a range of diseases in a population of orang-utans in Sabangau Forest (Central Kalimantan) and a community of chimpanzees in Budongo Forest (Uganda), by systematically varying transmission likelihood and probability of subsequent recovery. Both species have fission-fusion social systems, but differ considerably in their level of gregariousness. We used long-term behavioural data to create networks of association patterns on which the spread of different diseases was simulated. We found that chimpanzees were generally far more susceptible to the spread of diseases than orang-utans. When simulating different diseases that varied widely in their probability of transmission and recovery, it was found that the chimpanzee community was widely and strongly affected, while in orang-utans even highly infectious diseases had limited spread. Furthermore, when comparing the observed association network with a mean-field network (equal contact probability between group members), we found no major difference in simulated disease spread, suggesting that patterns of social bonding in orang-utans are not an important determinant of susceptibility to disease. In chimpanzees, the predicted size of the epidemic was smaller on the actual association network than on the mean-field network, indicating that patterns of social bonding have important effects on susceptibility to disease. We conclude that social networks are a potentially powerful tool to model the risk of disease transmission in great apes, and that chimpanzees are particularly threatened by infectious disease outbreaks as a result of their social structure.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen
dc.rights© 2014 Carne et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectApesen
dc.subjectChimpanzeesen
dc.subjectInfectious disease controlen
dc.subjectInfectious disease epidemiologyen
dc.subjectRespiratory infectionsen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.titleThe risk of disease to great apes : Simulating disease spread in orang-utan (pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) and chimpanzee (pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) association networksen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095039
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record