Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRamiro, Ricardo S.
dc.contributor.authorAlpedrinha, Joao
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Andy
dc.contributor.authorReece, Sarah E.
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-04T10:01:06Z
dc.date.available2013-12-04T10:01:06Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.identifier64168043
dc.identifierb02fd123-908c-4a66-8916-69576369d560
dc.identifier000288994900004
dc.identifier79953277575
dc.identifier.citationRamiro , R S , Alpedrinha , J , Carter , L , Gardner , A & Reece , S E 2011 , ' Sex and death : the effects of innate immune factors on the sexual reproduction of malaria parasites ' , PLoS Pathogens , vol. 7 , no. 3 , e1001309 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001309en
dc.identifier.issn1553-7374
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4248
dc.descriptionThis work was funded by Fundacao para a Cieˆncia e Tecnologia, Portugal (RSR: SFRH/BD/39960/2007 and JA: SFRH/BD/33206/2007; www.fct.mctes.pt); the Royal Society of London (AG: University Research Fellowship; http://royalsociety.org/); Balliol College, University of Oxford (AG; http://w ww.balliol.ox.ac.uk/); and the Wellcome Trust (SER: WT082234MA; http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/).en
dc.description.abstractMalaria parasites must undergo a round of sexual reproduction in the blood meal of a mosquito vector to be transmitted between hosts. Developing a transmission-blocking intervention to prevent parasites from mating is a major goal of biomedicine, but its effectiveness could be compromised if parasites can compensate by simply adjusting their sex allocation strategies. Recently, the application of evolutionary theory for sex allocation has been supported by experiments demonstrating that malaria parasites adjust their sex ratios in response to infection genetic diversity, precisely as predicted. Theory also predicts that parasites should adjust sex allocation in response to host immunity. Whilst data are supportive, the assumptions underlying this prediction - that host immune responses have differential effects on the mating ability of males and females - have not yet been tested. Here, we combine experimental work with theoretical models in order to investigate whether the development and fertility of male and female parasites is affected by innate immune factors and develop new theory to predict how parasites' sex allocation strategies should evolve in response to the observed effects. Specifically, we demonstrate that reactive nitrogen species impair gametogenesis of males only, but reduce the fertility of both male and female gametes. In contrast, tumour necrosis factor-alpha does not influence gametogenesis in either sex but impairs zygote development. Therefore, our experiments demonstrate that immune factors have complex effects on each sex, ranging from reducing the ability of gametocytes to develop into gametes, to affecting the viability of offspring. We incorporate these results into theory to predict how the evolutionary trajectories of parasite sex ratio strategies are shaped by sex differences in gamete production, fertility and offspring development. We show that medical interventions targeting offspring development are more likely to be 'evolution-proof' than interventions directed at killing males or females. Given the drive to develop medical interventions that interfere with parasite mating, our data and theoretical models have important implications.
dc.format.extent12
dc.format.extent512106
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Pathogensen
dc.subjectTrasmission-blocking immunityen
dc.subjectTumor-Necrosis-Factoren
dc.subjectNitric-oxide Donoren
dc.subjectPlasmodium-Falciparumen
dc.subjectPopulation-structureen
dc.subjectFertility Insuranceen
dc.subjectBlood parasitesen
dc.subjectGametocyteen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.titleSex and death : the effects of innate immune factors on the sexual reproduction of malaria parasitesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.ppat.1001309
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record