Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorGunn, D.A.
dc.contributor.authorRexbye, H.
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, C.E.M.
dc.contributor.authorMurray, P.G.
dc.contributor.authorFereday, A.
dc.contributor.authorCatt, S.D.
dc.contributor.authorTomlin, C.C.
dc.contributor.authorStrongitharm, B.H.
dc.contributor.authorPerrett, David Ian
dc.contributor.authorCatt, M.
dc.contributor.authorMayes, A.E.
dc.contributor.authorMessenger, A.G.
dc.contributor.authorGreen, M.R.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Ouderaa, F.
dc.contributor.authorVaupel, J.W.
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, K.
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-02T09:31:02Z
dc.date.available2013-12-02T09:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationGunn , D A , Rexbye , H , Griffiths , C E M , Murray , P G , Fereday , A , Catt , S D , Tomlin , C C , Strongitharm , B H , Perrett , D I , Catt , M , Mayes , A E , Messenger , A G , Green , M R , van der Ouderaa , F , Vaupel , J W & Christensen , K 2009 , ' Why some women look young for their age ' , PLoS One , vol. 4 , no. 12 , e8021 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008021en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 5335300
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 64e1ccb2-fd87-48f9-9bf0-9dd0c9af1b76
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 77954010574
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6025-0939/work/64360992
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4229
dc.descriptionBoth studies were funded by Unilever PLC (http://www.unilever.com/). Some of the authors are employed by Unilever PLC and were involved in the design, data collection and analysis as well as the decision to publish.en
dc.description.abstractThe desire of many to look young for their age has led to the establishment of a large cosmetics industry. However, the features of appearance that primarily determine how old women look for their age and whether genetic or environmental factors predominately influence such features are largely unknown. We studied the facial appearance of 102 pairs of female Danish twins aged 59 to 81 as well as 162 British females aged 45 to 75. Skin wrinkling, hair graying and lip height were significantly and independently associated with how old the women looked for their age. The appearance of facial sun-damage was also found to be significantly correlated to how old women look for their age and was primarily due to its commonality with the appearance of skin wrinkles. There was also considerable variation in the perceived age data that was unaccounted for. Composite facial images created from women who looked young or old for their age indicated that the structure of subcutaneous tissue was partly responsible. Heritability analyses of the appearance features revealed that perceived age, pigmented age spots, skin wrinkles and the appearance of sun-damage were influenced more or less equally by genetic and environmental factors. Hair graying, recession of hair from the forehead and lip height were influenced mainly by genetic factors whereas environmental factors influenced hair thinning. These findings indicate that women who look young for their age have large lips, avoid sun-exposure and possess genetic factors that protect against the development of gray hair and skin wrinkles. The findings also demonstrate that perceived age is a better biomarker of skin, hair and facial aging than chronological age.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen
dc.rights© 2009 Gunn et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectAgingen
dc.subjectGenetic factorsen
dc.subjectEnvironmental factorsen
dc.subjectFacial appearanceen
dc.subjectSkin agingen
dc.subjectPerceived ageen
dc.titleWhy some women look young for their ageen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008021
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record