Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBaily, Charles
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-26T23:01:32Z
dc.date.available2013-10-26T23:01:32Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifier.citationBaily , C 2013 , ' Early atomic models - from mechanical to quantum (1904-1913) ' , The European Physical Journal H , vol. 38 , no. 1 , pp. 1-38 . https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2012-30009-7en
dc.identifier.issn2102-6459
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 52692590
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 6efe3f1e-f2c2-452b-81c3-f9c5d9cc6e9b
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84879651709
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-6213-503X/work/41932047
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4118
dc.description.abstractA complete history of early atomic models would fill volumes, but a reasonably coherent tale of the path from mechanical atoms to the quantum can be told by focusing on the relevant work of three great contributors to atomic physics, in the critically important years between 1904 and 1913: J.J. Thomson, Ernest Rutherford and Niels Bohr. We first examine the origins of Thomson’s mechanical atomic models, from his ethereal vortex atoms in the early 1880’s, to the myriad “corpuscular” atoms he proposed following the discovery of the electron in 1897. Beyond qualitative predictions for the periodicity of the elements, the application of Thomson’s atoms to problems in scattering and absorption led to quantitative predictions that were confirmed by experiments with high-velocity electrons traversing thin sheets of metal. Still, the much more massive and energetic α-particles being studied by Rutherford were better suited for exploring the interior of the atom, and careful measurements on the angular dependence of their scattering eventually allowed him to infer the existence of an atomic nucleus. Niels Bohr was particularly troubled by the radiative instability inherent to any mechanical atom, and succeeded in 1913 where others had failed in the prediction of emission spectra, by making two bold hypotheses that were in contradiction to the laws of classical physics, but necessary in order to account for experimental facts.
dc.format.extent38
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe European Physical Journal Hen
dc.rights(c) EDP Sciences, Springer-Verlag 2012. This is an author version of this article. The final published version is available from http://link.springer.comen
dc.subjectAtomic modelsen
dc.subjectThomsonen
dc.subjectRutherforden
dc.subjectBohren
dc.subjectQuantumen
dc.subjectHistory of physicsen
dc.subjectQC Physicsen
dc.subject.lccQCen
dc.titleEarly atomic models - from mechanical to quantum (1904-1913)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Physics and Astronomyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2012-30009-7
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2013-10-27
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1140%2Fepjh%2Fe2012-30009-7en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record