Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMavor, Kenneth I.
dc.contributor.authorLouis, Winnifred R.
dc.contributor.authorLaythe, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-29T16:01:02Z
dc.date.available2013-08-29T16:01:02Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.identifier.citationMavor , K I , Louis , W R & Laythe , B 2011 , ' Religion, prejudice, and authoritarianism : Is RWA a boon or bane to the psychology of religion? ' , Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion , vol. 50 , no. 1 , pp. 22-43 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01550.xen
dc.identifier.issn0021-8294
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 46540344
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 0fa89dd8-ed34-42f8-8a06-aa60a4c78d03
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000287925500002
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 79952203580
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3160-3889/work/60427961
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4025
dc.description.abstractIn research on religiosity and prejudice, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) has been studied alongside variables such as fundamentalism and orthodoxy. Four concerns regarding research on the relationship between RWA and religiosity are identified: (1) the overlap of religiosity and prejudice within the RWA scale; (2) the inflation of relationships by correlating part-whole measures; (3) covariation in the extremes of the construct hiding the possible independence of components within RWA; and (4) statistical artifacts arising in multiple regression from the combination of these factors. We elaborate these four issues and then demonstrate how they can lead to different interpretations of some previously published data. The article concludes with suggestions for the management and resolution of these issues that may allow RWA to continue to be used in religiosity and prejudice research and how it might evolve to become the boon to researchers that they seek.
dc.format.extent22
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal for the Scientific Study of Religionen
dc.rightsThis is the author's version of this work. The definitive version © 2011 The Society for the Scientific Study of Religion is available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.comen
dc.subjectOrientationen
dc.subjectHomosexualityen
dc.subjectRight-wing authoritarianismen
dc.subjectPersonalityen
dc.subjectPrejudiceen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectFundamentalismen
dc.subjectLessonsen
dc.subjectAttitudesen
dc.subjectSocial-dominanceen
dc.subjectReligiosityen
dc.subjectChristian orthodoxyen
dc.subjectIdentificationen
dc.subjectBL Religionen
dc.subject.lccBLen
dc.titleReligion, prejudice, and authoritarianism : Is RWA a boon or bane to the psychology of religion?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Equality, Diversity & Inclusionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01550.x
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01550.x/fullen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record