Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMavridis, Lazaros
dc.contributor.authorNath, Neetika
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, John B. O.
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-06T11:31:07Z
dc.date.available2013-08-06T11:31:07Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-03
dc.identifier.citationMavridis , L , Nath , N & Mitchell , J B O 2013 , ' PFClust : a novel parameter free clustering algorithm ' , BMC Bioinformatics , vol. 14 , no. 213 , 213 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-213en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2105
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 57883350
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e3f0b5d6-d9ec-4c86-b3d4-9ec6529538c0
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84879809457
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-0379-6097/work/34033396
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/3930
dc.description.abstractBackground: We present the algorithm PFClust (Parameter Free Clustering), which is able automatically to cluster data and identify a suitable number of clusters to group them into without requiring any parameters to be specified by the user. The algorithm partitions a dataset into a number of clusters that share some common attributes, such as their minimum expectation value and variance of intra-cluster similarity. A set of n objects can be clustered into any number of clusters from one to n, and there are many different hierarchical and partitional, agglomerative and divisive, clustering methodologies available that can be used to do this. Nonetheless, automatically determining the number of clusters present in a dataset constitutes a significant challenge for clustering algorithms. Identifying a putative optimum number of clusters to group the objects into involves computing and evaluating a range of clusterings with different numbers of clusters. However, there is no agreed or unique definition of optimum in this context. Thus, we test PFClust on datasets for which an external gold standard of 'correct' cluster definitions exists, noting that this division into clusters may be suboptimal according to other reasonable criteria. PFClust is heuristic in the sense that it cannot be described in terms of optimising any single simply-expressed metric over the space of possible clusterings. Results: We validate PFClust firstly with reference to a number of synthetic datasets consisting of 2D vectors, showing that its clustering performance is at least equal to that of six other leading methodologies -- even though five of the other methods are told in advance how many clusters to use. We also demonstrate the ability of PFClust to classify the three dimensional structures of protein domains, using a set of folds taken from the structural bioinformatics database CATH. Conclusions: We show that PFClust is able to cluster the test datasets a little better, on average, than any of the other algorithms, and furthermore is able to do this without the need to specify any external parameters. Results on the synthetic datasets demonstrate that PFClust generates meaningful clusters, while our algorithm also shows excellent agreement with the correct assignments for a dataset extracted from the CATH part-manually curated classification of protein domain structures.
dc.format.extent21
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Bioinformaticsen
dc.rights© 2013 Mavridis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectPFClust (Parameter Free Clustering)en
dc.subjectClustering algorithmsen
dc.subjectQD Chemistryen
dc.subject.lccQDen
dc.titlePFClust : a novel parameter free clustering algorithmen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Chemistryen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Biomedical Sciences Research Complexen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.EaSTCHEMen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-213
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/14/213/en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record