Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorNutley, Sandra Margaret
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Alison Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Huw Talfryn Oakley
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-10T17:01:03Z
dc.date.available2013-05-10T17:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2013-02
dc.identifier52350710
dc.identifier36a0d490-d35e-43ef-a406-1f35629098e2
dc.identifier.citationNutley , S M , Powell , A E & Davies , H T O 2013 , What counts as good evidence . Alliance for Useful Evidence , London .en
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2653-3695/work/57821586
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/3518
dc.description.abstractMaking better use of evidence is essential if public services are to deliver more for less. Central to this challenge is the need for a clearer understanding about standards of evidence that can be applied to the research informing social policy. This paper reviews the extent to which it is possible to reach a workable consensus on ways of identifying and labelling evidence. It does this by exploring the efforts made to date and the debates that have ensued. Throughout, the focus is on evidence that is underpinned by research, rather than other sources of evidence such as expert opinion or stakeholder views.
dc.format.extent40
dc.format.extent365011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAlliance for Useful Evidence
dc.subjectevidence theoryen
dc.subjectevidence-based practiceen
dc.subjectHN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reformen
dc.subject.lccHNen
dc.titleWhat counts as good evidenceen
dc.typeReporten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Managementen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.alliance4usefulevidence.org/assets/What-Counts-as-Good-Evidence-WEB.pdfen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record