Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMacias Garcia, C.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, G.
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez Zuarth, C.
dc.contributor.authorGraves, J. A.
dc.contributor.authorRitchie, M. G.
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-17T10:01:02Z
dc.date.available2013-04-17T10:01:02Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier21127602
dc.identifierae9c0bdc-08a3-4741-b8fa-da86f7aa2b83
dc.identifier000303325700009
dc.identifier84877771655
dc.identifier.citationMacias Garcia , C , Smith , G , Gonzalez Zuarth , C , Graves , J A & Ritchie , M G 2012 , ' Variation in sexual dimorphism and assortative mating do not predict genetic divergence in the sexually dimorphic Goodeid fish Girardinichthys multiradiatus ' , Current Zoology , vol. 58 , no. 3 , pp. 440-452 . https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/58.3.440en
dc.identifier.issn1674-5507
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7913-8675/work/46761115
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/3483
dc.description.abstractSexual dimorphism is often used as a proxy for the intensity of sexual selection in comparative studies of sexual selection and diversification. The Mexican Goodeinae are a group of livebearing freshwater fishes with large variation between species in sexual dimorphism in body shape. Previously we found an association between variation in morphological sexual dimorphism between species and the amount of gene flow within populations in the Goodeinae. Here we have examined if morphological differentiation within a single dimorphic species is related to assortative mating or gene flow between populations. In the Amarillo fish Girardinichthys multiradiatus studies have shown that exaggerated male fins are targets of female preferences. We find that populations of the species differ in the level of sexual dimorphism displayed due to faster evolution of differences in male than female morphology. However, this does not predict variation in assortative mating tests in the laboratory; in fact differences in male morphology are negatively correlated with assortative mating. Microsatellite markers reveal significant genetic differences between populations. However, gene flow is not predicted by either morphological differences or assortative mating. Rather, it demonstrates a pattern of isolation by distance with greater differentiation between watersheds. We discuss the caveats of predicting behavioural and genetic divergence from so-called proxies of sexual selection [Current Zoology 58 (3): 440-452, 2012].
dc.format.extent13
dc.format.extent353298
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Zoologyen
dc.subjectSexual dimorphismen
dc.subjectAssortative matingen
dc.subjectGenetic distanceen
dc.subjectSpeciationen
dc.subjectViviparous fishen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subjectQH Natural historyen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.subject.lccQHen
dc.titleVariation in sexual dimorphism and assortative mating do not predict genetic divergence in the sexually dimorphic Goodeid fish Girardinichthys multiradiatusen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorNERCen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/czoolo/58.3.440
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.currentzoology.org/paperdetail.asp?id=12053en
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/E008216/1en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record