Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBlank, Jan Hendrik
dc.coverage.spatial283en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-05T14:25:05Z
dc.date.available2013-04-05T14:25:05Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-30
dc.identifieruk.bl.ethos.570546
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/3470
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation we investigate aspects of the Ru/[PBu₄]Br mixture in the homogeneous conversion of CO and H₂ as pioneered by Knifton, Dombek and Gresham. In chapter 1 we present a current overview of the literature on this subject. In chapter 2 we establish benchmark reactions and a full analysis of the liquid products that are generated during catalysis. The product mixture consists primarily of small alcohols (linear), acetic acid ethers, esters, and ethylene glycol. Both methanol and EG are formed independently, but methanol is then converted into almost all other products that we find. In chapter 3, the gas phase activity is assessed, and it is found that the Ru/[PBu₄]Br system is highly active for the WGS reaction, and as a result the reactor gas phase changes in composition over time. Following this, in chapter 4 the orders in p[sub](H2) and p[sub](CO) are determined for both the methanol formation reaction and the methanol homologation reaction. In order to achieve this, a simple kinetic model is developed to assess the relative reactivity of the system for each reaction. Using these orders and the knowledge of fast Water-Gas-Shift activity, we iteratively model the conditions in the reactor to closely fit and predict the methanol levels during the reaction. In chapter 5 the discovery of a promoter, [HPBu₃]Br is discussed. The promoter dissociates under catalysis conditions into HBr and PBu₃. The HBr then proceeds to improve catalysis by changing the catalyst composition, while the PBu₃ inhibits the homologation reaction selectively. In chapter 6 we proceed to test the activity of the system for a range of different promoters and solvents. The effect of bromide concentration, changing the halide, and using various acid promoters is tested. At last we attempt to expand on the scope of this reaction by using different ruthenium precursors and by using dimethyl ether as a reagent instead of methanol. Both seem effective. Notably, the conversion of CO₂ to methanol in a one-pot reaction was observed.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subjectIonic liquidsen_US
dc.subjectHomogeneous catalysisen_US
dc.subjectRutheniumen_US
dc.subjectSyngasen_US
dc.subjectPhosphonium saltsen_US
dc.subjectOxygenatesen_US
dc.subjectHigh pressureen_US
dc.subject.lccQD281.H8B6
dc.subject.lcshHydrogenationen_US
dc.subject.lcshCarbon monoxideen_US
dc.subject.lcshPlatinum group catalystsen_US
dc.subject.lcshRuthenium compoundsen_US
dc.titleCarbon monoxide hydrogenation using ruthenium catalystsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorEastman Chemical Companyen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


The following licence files are associated with this item:

  • Creative Commons

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported