Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDawson, Steve
dc.contributor.authorNorthridge, Simon Patrick
dc.contributor.authorWaples, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorRead, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-15T12:01:02Z
dc.date.available2013-03-15T12:01:02Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationDawson , S , Northridge , S P , Waples , D & Read , A 2013 , ' To ping or not to ping : the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries ' , Endangered Species Research , vol. 19 , no. 3 , pp. 201-221 . https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464en
dc.identifier.issn1863-5407
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 26523010
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: bd73e339-714c-492c-bb34-4564718269e9
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84894266690
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7402-3462/work/48131912
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/3394
dc.description.abstractActive sound emitters (‘pingers’) are used in several gillnet fisheries to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans, and/or to reduce depredation by dolphins. Here, we review studies conducted to determine how effective these devices may be as management tools. Significant reductions in bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena, franciscana Pontoporia blainvillei, common Delphinus delphis and striped dolphin Stenella coeruleoalba, and beaked whales as a group have been demonstrated. For harbour porpoise this result has been replicated in 14 controlled experiments in North America and Europe, and appears to be due to porpoises avoiding the area ensonified by pingers. Two gillnet fisheries (California-Oregon driftnet fishery for swordfish; New England groundfish fishery) with mandatory pinger use have been studied for over a decade. Bycatch rates of dolphins/porpoises have fallen by 50 to 60%, and there is no evidence of bycatch increasing over time due to habituation. In both fisheries, bycatch rates were significantly higher in nets sparsely equipped with pingers or in which pingers had failed, than in nets without any pingers at all. Studies of pinger use to reduce depredation by bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus generally show small and inconsistent improvements in fish catches and somewhat reduced net damage. Dolphin bycatch in these fisheries is rare, but still occurs in nets with pingers. Taken together, these studies suggest that the most promising candidates for bycatch reduction via pinger use will be gillnet fisheries in developed countries in which the bycaught cetaceans are generally neophobic species with large home ranges. We offer a set of lessons learned from the last decade of bycatch management.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEndangered Species Researchen
dc.rightsThis in an open access article. Copyright © 2013 Inter-Research.en
dc.subjectGillneten
dc.subjectBycatchen
dc.subjectDolphinen
dc.subjectPorpoiseen
dc.subjectPingeren
dc.subjectAcoustic devicesen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.titleTo ping or not to ping : the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheriesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Sea Mammal Research Uniten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record