The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
Computer Science (School of) >
Computer Science >
Computer Science Theses >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 11 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
StephaneJELengrandPhDThesis.pdf2.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Normalisation & equivalence in proof theory & type theory
Other Titles: Normalisation & equivalence en théorie de la démonstration & théorie des types
Authors: Lengrand, Stéphane J. E.
Supervisors: Dyckhoff, Roy
Kesner, Delia
Keywords: Logic
Proof theory
Type theory
Issue Date: 8-Dec-2006
Abstract: At the heart of the connections between Proof Theory and Type Theory, the Curry-Howard correspondence provides proof-terms with computational features and equational theories, i.e. notions of normalisation and equivalence. This dissertation contributes to extend its framework in the directions of proof-theoretic formalisms (such as sequent calculus) that are appealing for logical purposes like proof-search, powerful systems beyond propositional logic such as type theories, and classical (rather than intuitionistic) reasoning. Part I is entitled Proof-terms for Intuitionistic Implicational Logic. Its contributions use rewriting techniques on proof-terms for natural deduction (Lambda-calculus) and sequent calculus, and investigate normalisation and cut-elimination, with call-by-name and call-by-value semantics. In particular, it introduces proof-term calculi for multiplicative natural deduction and for the depth-bounded sequent calculus G4. The former gives rise to the calculus Lambdalxr with explicit substitutions, weakenings and contractions that refines the Lambda-calculus and Beta-reduction, and preserves strong normalisation with a full notion of composition of substitutions. The latter gives a new insight to cut-elimination in G4. Part II, entitled Type Theory in Sequent Calculus develops a theory of Pure Type Sequent Calculi (PTSC), which are sequent calculi that are equivalent (with respect to provability and normalisation) to Pure Type Systems but better suited for proof-search, in connection with proof-assistant tactics and proof-term enumeration algorithms. Part III, entitled Towards Classical Logic, presents some approaches to classical type theory. In particular it develops a sequent calculus for a classical version of System F_omega. Beyond such a type theory, the notion of equivalence of classical proofs becomes crucial and, with such a notion based on parallel rewriting in the Calculus of Structures, we compute canonical representatives of equivalent proofs.
Other Identifiers:
Type: Thesis
Publisher: University of St Andrews
Appears in Collections:Computer Science Theses

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)