Files in this item
Virtue epistemology and the analysis of knowledge
Item metadata
dc.contributor.advisor | Greenough, Patrick | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ebert, Philip A. | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Cohen, Stewart | |
dc.contributor.author | Church, Ian M. | |
dc.coverage.spatial | 187 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-20T20:56:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-20T20:56:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/3118 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis centers on two trends in epistemology: (i) the dissatisfaction with the reductive analysis of knowledge, the project of explicating knowledge in terms of necessary and jointly sufficient conditions, and (ii) the popularity of virtue-theoretic epistemologies. The goal of this thesis is to endorse non-reductive virtue epistemology. Given that prominent renditions of virtue epistemology assume the reductive model, however, such a move is not straightforward—work needs to be done to elucidate what is wrong with the reductive model, in general, and why reductive accounts of virtue epistemology, specifically, are lacking. The first part of this thesis involves diagnosing what is wrong with the reductive model and defending that diagnosis against objections. The problem with the reductive project is the Gettier Problem. In Chapter 1, I lend credence to Linda Zagzebski’s grim 1994 diagnosis of Gettier problems (and the abandonment of the reductive model) by examining the nature of luck, the key component of Gettier problems. In Chapter 2, I vindicate this diagnosis against a range of critiques from the contemporary literature. The second part involves applying this diagnosis to prominent versions of (reductive) virtue epistemology. In Chapter 3, we consider the virtue epistemology of Alvin Plantinga. In Chapter 4, we consider the virtue epistemology of Ernest Sosa. Both are seminal and iconic; nevertheless, I argue that, in accord with our diagnosis, neither is able to viably surmount the Gettier Problem. Having diagnosed what is wrong with the reductive project and applied this diagnosis to prominent versions of (reductive) virtue epistemology, the final part of this thesis explores the possibility of non-reductive virtue epistemology. In Chapter 5, I argue that there are three strategies that can be used to develop non-reductive virtue epistemologies, strategies that are compatible with seminal non-reductive accounts of knowledge and preserve our favorite virtue-theoretic concepts. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of St Andrews | |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ | |
dc.subject | Virtue epistemology | en_US |
dc.subject | The Gettier Problem | en_US |
dc.subject | The analysis of knowledge | en_US |
dc.subject | Epistemic luck | en_US |
dc.subject | Alvin Plantinga | en_US |
dc.subject | Ernest Sosa | en_US |
dc.subject.lcc | BD176.C5 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Virtue epistemology | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Gettier problem | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Plantinga, Alvin--Contributions in theory of knowledge | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Sosa, Ernest--Contributions in theory of knowledge | en_US |
dc.title | Virtue epistemology and the analysis of knowledge | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | The University of St Andrews | en_US |
dc.publisher.department | The University of Stirling | en_US |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Embargo period has ended, thesis made available in accordance with University regulations. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17630/10023-3118 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.