The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 78 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Fazey2010EnvironmentalCons37Defining.pdf835.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research
Authors: Evely, Anna C.
Fazey, Ioan
Lambin, Xavier
Lambert, Emily
Allen, Sarah
Pinard, Michelle
Keywords: Cross-disciplinary
Integrative research
GE Environmental Sciences
Issue Date: Dec-2010
Citation: Evely , A C , Fazey , I , Lambin , X , Lambert , E , Allen , S & Pinard , M 2010 , ' Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research ' Environmental Conservation , vol 37 , no. 4 , pp. 442-450 . , 10.1017/S0376892910000792
Abstract: Cross-disciplinary research is advocated as a way of improving understanding of the complexity of environmental problems; cross-disciplinary projects, centres and academic institutes have increased. However, there is confusion over the nature of cross-disciplinary research. Through review of papers defining themselves as cross-disciplinary that aim to address conservation problems, and by standardizing the definition of cross-disciplinary research, it is possible to evaluate the potential research impact on peers and practitioners. When papers were reclassified by authors, those reclassified as transdisciplinary were perceived to have a greater impact on practitioners, and those reclassified as non cross-disciplinary had the greatest impact on colleagues. Having clear definitions for types of cross-disciplinary research would help establish a firm foundation, not only for improving research quality, but also for evaluating research impact. While the number of cross-disciplinary studies is increasing, cross-disciplinary research falls short of integrating disciplinary methods in much depth and does not have much impact on participants outside of academia.
Version: Publisher PDF
Status: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 0376-8929
Type: Journal article
Rights: (c) Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010. Available from
Appears in Collections:Geography & Sustainable Development Research
Centre for Higher Education Research (CHER) Research
Scottish Oceans Institute Research
St Andrews Sustainablity Institute Research
University of St Andrews Research

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)