Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHawley, Katherine (Katherine Jane)
dc.contributor.advisorRoca-Royes, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorKang, Li
dc.coverage.spatialvii, 92en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-09T08:43:34Z
dc.date.available2012-08-09T08:43:34Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/3037
dc.description.abstractHow should we understand de re modal features of objects, if there are such features? Any answer to the question is connected to how we should think about coincident objects, objects which occupy the same spatio-temporal region and share the same underlying matter. This thesis is mainly about the connections between de re modality and coincidence. My interest in the connections is twofold: First, how do theories of de re modality interact with theories about coincidence? Details of interactions are discussed from chapter 2 to chapter 5. Second, do the considerations about de re modality offer reasons to favour a particular position about coincidence? And how does this answer contribute to current meta-ontological debate? These are raised in chapter 1 and are answered in conclusion.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectDe re modalityen_US
dc.subjectCoincidenceen_US
dc.subjectThe grounding problemen_US
dc.subjectTransworld identityen_US
dc.subject.lccBD215.5K2
dc.subject.lcshModality (Theory of knowledge)en_US
dc.subject.lcshCoincidenceen_US
dc.titleCoincidence and modalityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnameMPhil Master of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record