Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLemasson, Alban
dc.contributor.authorOuattara, Karim
dc.contributor.authorPetit, Eric J.
dc.contributor.authorZuberbuehler, Klaus
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-25T14:31:02Z
dc.date.available2012-07-25T14:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-16
dc.identifier.citationLemasson , A , Ouattara , K , Petit , E J & Zuberbuehler , K 2011 , ' Social learning of vocal structure in a nonhuman primate? ' BMC Evolutionary Biology , vol. 11 , 362 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-362en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2148
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 16989123
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 12245e99-eebe-4417-8135-591fe047862e
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000299217300001
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 83455186446
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/3021
dc.description.abstractBackground: Non-human primate communication is thought to be fundamentally different from human speech, mainly due to vast differences in vocal control. The lack of these abilities in non-human primates is especially striking if compared to some marine mammals and bird species, which has generated somewhat of an evolutionary conundrum. What are the biological roots and underlying evolutionary pressures of the human ability to voluntarily control sound production and learn the vocal utterances of others? One hypothesis is that this capacity has evolved gradually in humans from an ancestral stage that resembled the vocal behavior of modern primates. Support for this has come from studies that have documented limited vocal flexibility and convergence in different primate species, typically in calls used during social interactions. The mechanisms underlying these patterns, however, are currently unknown. Specifically, it has been difficult to rule out explanations based on genetic relatedness, suggesting that such vocal flexibility may not be the result of social learning. Results: To address this point, we compared the degree of acoustic similarity of contact calls in free-ranging Campbell's monkeys as a function of their social bonds and genetic relatedness. We calculated three different indices to compare the similarities between the calls' frequency contours, the duration of grooming interactions and the microsatellite-based genetic relatedness between partners. We found a significantly positive relation between bond strength and acoustic similarity that was independent of genetic relatedness. Conclusion: Genetic factors determine the general species-specific call repertoire of a primate species, while social factors can influence the fine structure of some the call types. The finding is in line with the more general hypothesis that human speech has evolved gradually from earlier primate-like vocal communication.
dc.format.extent7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.rights© 2011 Lemasson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectMonkeysen
dc.subjectCaptive groupen
dc.subjectVocalizationsen
dc.subjectCallsen
dc.subjectChimpanzeesen
dc.subjectAttentionen
dc.subjectProduceen
dc.subjectCercopithecus-campbellien
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleSocial learning of vocal structure in a nonhuman primate?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-362
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record