Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRussell, Gillian
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T13:30:12Z
dc.date.available2024-07-02T13:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-07
dc.identifier303594636
dc.identifierf6ace61b-4802-401a-8173-afa0d804a8a7
dc.identifier85187147925
dc.identifier.citationRussell , G 2024 , ' How the laws of logic lie ' , Episteme , vol. 20 , no. 4 , pp. 833-851 . https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2024.4en
dc.identifier.issn1742-3600
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/30074
dc.description.abstractNancy Cartwright's 1983 book How the Laws of Physics Lie argued that theories of physics often make use of idealisations, and that as a result many of these theories were not true. The present paper looks at idealisation in logic and argues that, at least sometimes, the laws of logic fail to be true. That might be taken as a kind of skepticism, but I argue rather that idealisation is a legitimate tool in logic, just as in physics, and recognising this frees logicians up to use false laws where these are helpful.
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent198677
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEpistemeen
dc.subjectLogicen
dc.subjectAnti-exceptionalismen
dc.subjectModelingen
dc.subjectScienceen
dc.subjectNancy Cartwrighten
dc.subjectIdealisationen
dc.subjectLaws of logicen
dc.subjectNatural languageen
dc.subjectSimulationsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.titleHow the laws of logic lieen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Arché Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics and Epistemologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/epi.2024.4
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record