Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMason, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorFrick, Liezel
dc.contributor.authorCastelló, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Wenjuan
dc.contributor.authorChong , Sin-Wang
dc.contributor.authorVillalba, Laura Díaz
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Morante, Marina
dc.contributor.authorKong, Ming Sum
dc.contributor.authorSakurai, Yusuke
dc.contributor.authorShojaeian, Nazila
dc.contributor.authorSpronken-Smith, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorWeise, Crista
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T10:30:15Z
dc.date.available2024-07-02T10:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-27
dc.identifier301505151
dc.identifier5ba93897-f3de-4dd2-b540-11fa40dda758
dc.identifier85191719080
dc.identifier.citationMason , S , Frick , L , Castelló , M , Cheng , W , Chong , S-W , Villalba , L D , García-Morante , M , Kong , M S , Sakurai , Y , Shojaeian , N , Spronken-Smith , R & Weise , C 2024 , ' Prominence, promotion and positioning of the ‘Thesis by publication’ in six countries ' , Higher Education Policy , vol. Online First . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00350-7en
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0009-0001-8222-9022/work/158592511
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4519-0544/work/158592572
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/30066
dc.description.abstractThe international nature of doctoral education creates interesting tensions where national systems, institutional policies, disciplinary customs, individual supervisor preferences, and doctoral researcher needs meet. The Thesis by Publication (TBP), a model where published works are included within the thesis, is available to doctoral researchers in many disciplines and institutions, but it is not a universally accepted format or approached in a homogeneous way. Policy has been known to shape practice, yet we know little about how institutional policies shape TBP practices across different national contexts. This study presents a content analysis of policy documents related to the TBP in public universities across six countries: Australia, Japan, New Zealand, South Africa, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Our goal is to understand the prevalence of the TBP and related policy documentation in different contexts, and how the model is promoted and positioned within the doctoral landscape. Findings from our study challenge the often-stated notion that the TBP is a universally understood format. Our findings also show the risks in the absence of explicit policies, as well as the possible inequalities that may arise as a result of a lack of policy transparency and synergy within and across contexts.
dc.format.extent652130
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofHigher Education Policyen
dc.subjectThesis by publicationen
dc.subjectDoctoral educationen
dc.subjectPhDen
dc.subjectScholarly publishingen
dc.subjectDOAEen
dc.titleProminence, promotion and positioning of the ‘Thesis by publication’ in six countriesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. International Education Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00350-7
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record