Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRobles-Zurita, Jose Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMcMeekin, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Francis
dc.contributor.authorMair, Frances S
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T12:30:08Z
dc.date.available2024-06-21T12:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-18
dc.identifier303436152
dc.identifiera7855fd9-f8a4-41ef-a68b-08b068df7cdc
dc.identifier.citationRobles-Zurita , J A , McMeekin , N , Sullivan , F , Mair , F S & Briggs , A 2024 , ' Health economic evaluation of lung cancer screening using a 2 diagnostic blood test : the Early detection of Cancer of the Lung 3 Scotland (ECLS) ' , Current Oncology , vol. 31 , no. 6 , pp. 3546-3562 . https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31060261en
dc.identifier.issn1718-7729
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6623-4964/work/162168516
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/30038
dc.descriptionFunding: Funding for the ECLS study was received from Oncimmune Ltd and the Scottish Government Health & Social Care Directorate of the Chief Scientist Office (CSO).en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Diagnostic blood tests have the potential to identify lung cancer in people at high risk. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a lung cancer screening intervention, using the EarlyCDT®-Lung Test (ECLS) with subsequent X-ray and low-dose chest CT scans (LDCT) for patients with a positive test result, compared to both usual care and LDCT screening for the target population. Methods: We conducted a model-based lifetime analysis from a UK NHS and personal social services perspective. We estimated incremental net monetary benefit (NMB) for the ECLS intervention compared to no screening and to LDCT screening. Results: The incremental NMB of ECLS intervention compared to no screening was GBP 33,179 (95% CI: −GBP 81,396, GBP 147,180) and GBP 140,609 (95% CI: -GBP 36,255, GBP 316,612), respectively, for a cost-effectiveness threshold of GBP 20,000 and GBP 30,000 per quality-adjusted life year. The same figures compared with LDCT screening were GBP 162,095 (95% CI: GBP 52,698, GBP 271,735) and GBP 52,185 (95% CI: −GBP 113,152, GBP 220,711). Conclusions: The ECLS intervention is the most cost-effective screening alternative, with the highest probability of being cost-effective, when compared to no screening or LDCT screening. This result may change with modifications of the parameters, suggesting that the three alternatives considered in the main analysis are potentially cost-effective.
dc.format.extent17
dc.format.extent706324
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Oncologyen
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen
dc.subjectEconomic valuationen
dc.subjectLung canceren
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.subjectDiagnostic blood testen
dc.subjectRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)en
dc.subject3rd-NDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccRC0254en
dc.titleHealth economic evaluation of lung cancer screening using a 2 diagnostic blood test : the Early detection of Cancer of the Lung 3 Scotland (ECLS)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Sir James Mackenzie Institute for Early Diagnosisen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/curroncol31060261
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/31/6/261en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record