Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorWolfe, Judith (Judith E.)
dc.contributor.advisorOliver, Simon
dc.contributor.authorCrickenberger, Cameron
dc.coverage.spatial168en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T13:45:31Z
dc.date.available2024-05-08T13:45:31Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29833
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is a constructive theology of retrieval in which I develop a metaphysical account of the trinitarian life in se as the eternally plerotic movement of mutually kenotic love. First, I turn to the trinitarian theology of Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae to argue that his attribution of a concept of substantial unity derived from individually hypostatized rational natures to the divine essence prevents a priori true and reciprocal relationality between the divine persons, especially in relation to the act of love. Turning next to his anthropology, I argue that love (amor) is ontologically correlative to and convertible with esse. This creates the possibility of the ecstatic relationality of love within the divine life, such that the unio substantialis identified in God may also admit of a unio realis evocative of Thomas’s concept of amicitia. The trinitarian theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar is then explored, focusing particularly on the nature of the kenosis of Father and Son and the causa finalis of the Spirit, which he adapts from Ferdinand Ulrich. While kenosis remains as the heart of this vision of divine love, the kenotic love of the Father and Son surges forth in the infinite freedom of the Spirit who manifests the plerotic fulfilment of mutual kenotic love. Finally, the dichotomies of essence/person and common/particular explored with Thomas and von Balthasar are reconciled through the categories of Hemmerle’s trinitarian ontology, specifically focusing on the unique role of the Spirit. Understood in its trinitarian fulness, I argue that the act of divine love can be characterized as amicitia, in which the essential unio substantialis and personal unio realis coincide in the relational simplicity of the one absolute life of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. I end the thesis by suggesting its implications for the relation between God and creation and the relations within creation itself.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectTrinityen_US
dc.subjectLoveen_US
dc.subjectHans Urs von Balthasaren_US
dc.subjectThomas Aquinasen_US
dc.subjectFerdinand Ulrichen_US
dc.subjectKlaus Hemmerleen_US
dc.subjectAct and beingen_US
dc.subjectUnity and distinctionen_US
dc.subjectPsychological analogyen_US
dc.subjectPneumatologyen_US
dc.subjectParticipatory ontologyen_US
dc.titleWhat's love got to do with it? A constructive theology of love as the primary image of the trinitarian life in conversation with Thomas Aquinas and Hans Urs von Balthasaren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. St Mary's Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorFoundation of St Matthiasen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2029-05-07
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 7 May 2029en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/886


The following licence files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International