Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBurke, Rachael m
dc.contributor.authorNliwasa, Marriott
dc.contributor.authorFeasey, Helena r a
dc.contributor.authorChaisson, Lelia h
dc.contributor.authorGolub, Jonathan e
dc.contributor.authorNaufal, Fahd
dc.contributor.authorShapiro, Adrienne e
dc.contributor.authorRuperez, Maria
dc.contributor.authorTelisinghe, Lily
dc.contributor.authorAyles, Helen
dc.contributor.authorCorbett, Elizabeth l
dc.contributor.authorMacpherson, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T15:30:15Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T15:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.identifier297120394
dc.identifier22485fe8-ce53-4d73-8a35-714139e0d4f0
dc.identifier85103967273
dc.identifier.citationBurke , R M , Nliwasa , M , Feasey , H R A , Chaisson , L H , Golub , J E , Naufal , F , Shapiro , A E , Ruperez , M , Telisinghe , L , Ayles , H , Corbett , E L & Macpherson , P 2021 , ' Community-based active case-finding interventions for tuberculosis : a systematic review ' , The Lancet Public Health , vol. 6 , no. 5 , pp. e283-e299 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00033-5en
dc.identifier.issn2468-2667
dc.identifier.othercrossref: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00033-5
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3109-6722/work/148420986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29746
dc.descriptionThis work was made possible through grants provided by the WHO Global TB Programme. RMB, ELC, and PM hold Wellcome fellowships: 203905/Z/16/Z (RMB), 200901/Z/16/Z (ELC), and 206575/Z/17/Z (PM). MR, LT, and HA are funded by part of the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2 programme supported by the EU (grant number RIA2016S-1632-TREATS). AES is supported by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant K23AI140918.en
dc.description.abstractBackground Community-based active case-finding interventions might identify and treat more people with tuberculosis disease than standard case detection. We aimed to assess whether active case-finding interventions can affect tuberculosis epidemiology in the wider community. Methods We did a systematic review by searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for studies that compared tuberculosis case notification rates, tuberculosis disease prevalence, or tuberculosis infection prevalence or incidence in children, between populations exposed and unexposed to active case-finding interventions. We included studies published in English between Jan 1, 1980, and April 13, 2020. Studies of active case-finding in the general population, in populations perceived to be at high risk for tuberculosis, and in closed settings were included, whereas studies of tuberculosis screening at health-care facilities, among household contacts, or among children only, and studies that screened fewer than 1000 people were excluded. To estimate effectiveness, we extracted or calculated case notification rates, prevalence of tuberculosis disease, and incidence or prevalence of tuberculosis infection in children, and compared ratios of these outcomes between groups that were exposed or not exposed to active case-finding interventions. Results 27 883 abstracts were screened and 988 articles underwent full text review. 28 studies contributed data for analysis of tuberculosis case notifications, nine for prevalence of tuberculosis disease, and two for incidence or prevalence of tuberculosis infection in children. In one cluster-randomised trial in South Africa and Zambia, an active case-finding intervention based on community mobilisation and sputum drop-off did not affect tuberculosis prevalence, whereas, in a cluster-randomised trial in Vietnam, an active case-finding intervention based on sputum tuberculosis tests for everyone reduced tuberculosis prevalence in the community. We found inconsistent, low-quality evidence that active case-finding might increase the number of cases of tuberculosis notified in populations with structural risk factors for tuberculosis. Interpretation Community-based active case-finding for tuberculosis might be effective in changing tuberculosis epidemiology and thereby improving population health if delivered with high coverage and intensity. If possible, active case-finding projects should incorporate a well designed, robust evaluation to contribute to the evidence base and help elucidate which delivery methods and diagnostic strategies are most effective. Funding WHO Global TB Programme.
dc.format.extent545481
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Lancet Public Healthen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subjectACen
dc.subjectDOAEen
dc.titleCommunity-based active case-finding interventions for tuberculosis : a systematic reviewen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00033-5
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record