Files in this item
High blood pressure and risk of dementia : a two-sample Mendelian randomization study in the UK biobank
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Sproviero, William | |
dc.contributor.author | Winchester, Laura | |
dc.contributor.author | Newby, Danielle | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernandes, Marco | |
dc.contributor.author | Shi, Liu | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodday, Sarah M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Prats-Uribe, Albert | |
dc.contributor.author | Alhambra, Daniel P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Buckley, Noel J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nevado-Holgado, Alejo J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-23T09:30:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-23T09:30:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-15 | |
dc.identifier | 301366939 | |
dc.identifier | 90b7b640-320c-4f41-b8b2-dc032c420c30 | |
dc.identifier | 85102583040 | |
dc.identifier | 33766239 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sproviero , W , Winchester , L , Newby , D , Fernandes , M , Shi , L , Goodday , S M , Prats-Uribe , A , Alhambra , D P , Buckley , N J & Nevado-Holgado , A J 2021 , ' High blood pressure and risk of dementia : a two-sample Mendelian randomization study in the UK biobank ' , Biological Psychiatry , vol. 89 , no. 8 , pp. 817-824 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.12.015 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0006-3223 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-4768-0934/work/158592723 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/29734 | |
dc.description | This work was supported by Janssen Research and Development , LLC (of Johnson & Johnson). | en |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Findings from randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting results on the association between blood pressure (BP) and dementia traits. We tested the hypothesis that a causal relationship exists between systolic BP (SBP) and/or diastolic BP (DBP) and risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: We performed a generalized summary Mendelian randomization (GSMR) analysis using summary statistics of a genome-wide association study meta-analysis of 299,024 individuals of SBP or DBP as exposure variables against three different outcomes: 1) AD diagnosis (International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project), 2) maternal family history of AD (UK Biobank), and 3) paternal family history of AD (UK Biobank). Finally, a combined meta-analysis of 368,440 individuals that included these three summary statistics was used as final outcome. Results: GSMR applied to the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project dataset revealed a significant effect of high SBP lowering the risk of AD (βGSMR = −0.19, p =.04). GSMR applied to the maternal family history of AD UK Biobank dataset (SBP [βGSMR = −0.12, p =.02], DBP [βGSMR = −0.10, p =.05]) and to the paternal family history of AD UK Biobank dataset (SBP [βGSMR = −0.16, p =.02], DBP [βGSMR = −0.24, p = 7.4 × 10−4]) showed the same effect. A subsequent combined meta-analysis confirmed the overall significant effect for the other SBP analyses (βGSMR = −0.14, p =.03). The DBP analysis in the combined meta-analysis also confirmed a DBP effect on AD (βGSMR = −0.14, p =.03). Conclusions: A causal effect exists between high BP and a reduced late-life risk of AD. The results were obtained through careful consideration of confounding factors and the application of complementary MR methods on independent cohorts. | |
dc.format.extent | 8 | |
dc.format.extent | 839792 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Biological Psychiatry | en |
dc.subject | Alzheimer's disease | en |
dc.subject | Blood pressure | en |
dc.subject | Family history of Alzheimer's disease | en |
dc.subject | Genetic variants | en |
dc.subject | Mendelian randomization | en |
dc.subject | Biological Psychiatry | en |
dc.subject | 3rd-NDAS | en |
dc.title | High blood pressure and risk of dementia : a two-sample Mendelian randomization study in the UK biobank | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Medicine | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Division | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.12.015 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.