Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSavaridas, Sarah L
dc.contributor.authorWhelehan, Patsy
dc.contributor.authorWarwick, Violet R
dc.contributor.authorVinnicombe, Sarah J
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Andrew J
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-22T14:30:11Z
dc.date.available2024-04-22T14:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-01
dc.identifier301288686
dc.identifier992d86bd-1218-4b94-9264-517a4b5d92e1
dc.identifier35143334
dc.identifier85130863711
dc.identifier.citationSavaridas , S L , Whelehan , P , Warwick , V R , Vinnicombe , S J & Evans , A J 2022 , ' Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosythesis and breast MRI to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy : patient tolerance and preference ' , The British Journal of Radiology , vol. 95 , no. 1134 , 20210779 . https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210779en
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC10996419
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29728
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DBT) is a novel imaging technique, combining contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and tomosynthesis. This may offer an alternative imaging technique to breast MRI for monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This paper addresses patient experience and preference regarding the two techniques. METHODS: Conducted as part of a prospective pilot study; patients were asked to complete questionnaires pertaining to their experience of CE-DBT and MRI following pre-treatment and end-of-treatment imaging. Questionnaires consisted of eight questions answered on a categorical scale, two using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and a question to indicate preference of imaging technique. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test for related samples using SPSS v. 25. RESULTS: 18 patients were enrolled in the pilot study. Matched CE-DBT and MRI questionnaires were completed after 22 patient episodes. Patient preference was indicated after 31 patient episodes. Overall, on 77% of occasions patients preferred CE-DBT with no difference between pre-treatment and end-of-treatment imaging. Overall experience (p = 0.008), non-breast pain (p = 0.046), anxiety measured using VAS (p = 0.003), and feeling of being put at ease by staff (p = 0.023) was better for CE-DBT. However, more breast pain was experienced during CE-DBT when measured on both VAS (p = 0.011) and categorical scale (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Our paper suggests that patients prefer CE-DBT to MRI, adding further evidence in favour of contrast-enhanced mammographic techniques. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Contrast mammographic techniques offer an alternative, more accessible imaging technique to breast MRI. Whilst other studies have addressed patient experience of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, this is the first study to directly explore patient preference for CE-DBT over MRI in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, finding that overall, patients preferred CE-DBT despite the relatively long breast compression.
dc.format.extent369681
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe British Journal of Radiologyen
dc.subjectBreast/diagnostic imagingen
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms/diagnostic imagingen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging/methodsen
dc.subjectMammography/methodsen
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant Therapyen
dc.subjectPilot Projectsen
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.titleContrast-enhanced digital breast tomosythesis and breast MRI to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy : patient tolerance and preferenceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20210779
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record