Question-relative knowledge for minimally rational agents
Abstract
Agents know some but not all logical consequences of what they know. Agents seem to be neither logically omniscient nor logically incompetent. Yet finding an intermediate standard of minimal rationality has proven difficult. In this paper, I take suggestions found in the literature [Lewis, D. 1988. Relevant Implication. Theoria 54 (3): 161174. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.1988.54.issue-3; Hawke, P., A. Özgün, and F. Berto. 2020. The Fundamental Problem of Logical Omniscience. Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (4): 727766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09536-6; Plebani, M., and G. Spolaore. 2021. Subject Matter: A Modest Proposal. The Philosophical Quarterly 71 (3): 605622. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa054] and join the forces of subject matter and impossible worlds approaches to devise a new solution to this quandary. I do so by combining a space of FDE worlds [Berto, F., and M. Jago. 2019. Impossible Worlds. Oxford University Press.] with a Lewisian (1988) understanding of subject matters as partitions. By doing so, I show how subject matters impose some order in the anarchic space of FDE worlds, while the worlds allow for distinctions between contents which would not otherwise be available. Combining the two approaches, then, brings us closer to the desired closure principles for knowledge of minimally rational agents.
Citation
Silva , F 2024 , ' Question-relative knowledge for minimally rational agents ' , Inquiry - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy , vol. Latest Articles . https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2024.2338794
Publication
Inquiry - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0020-174XType
Journal article
Description
Funding: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.