Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHawley, Katherine (Katherine Jane)
dc.contributor.advisorCruft, Rowan
dc.contributor.authorKelsall, Joshua James Clarke
dc.coverage.spatial197en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T11:51:35Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T11:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29478
dc.description.abstractPublic auditors such as Audit Scotland aim to provide independent assurance to the public that money is spent effectively, efficiently and that it, and the activities of public organisations, provide public value. This project has two objectives. Firstly, to develop conceptual models of public audit that support public organisations' trustworthiness as organisations that provide public value. Secondly, to develop conceptual models of public engagement that auditors (and public organisations generally) can use to build public trust in their organisations. The project has three parts. Part 1 provides the project's philosophical foundations, defining the core concepts of trust, trustworthiness, distrust, and untrustworthiness that I employ in the thesis. Then I apply those concepts to trust relations between the public and public organisations. In part 2, I examine the relationship between audit and the trustworthiness of government. I will defend audit against audit sceptics, who argue that audit undermines public organisations' trustworthiness and public trust in those organisations. I will do this by arguing that whether audit faces these objections is dependent on the model of audit practice that we adopt, and I propose models of audit that avoid the audit sceptics’ objections. In part 3, I develop conceptual models of trust- conducive public engagement, and I examine the role that auditors can play in enhancing public trust in public organisations. Firstly, I determine whether the obligation to build trust in public organisations is compatible with audit function. Secondly, I determine what public organisations' communicative obligations are; for instance, do they require public organisations always to be open, honest, and transparent? Finally, I argue that public engagement models that empower the voices of those engaged with are more likely to induce trust between the organisation which empowers and those empowered through such public engagement.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccBJ1500.T78K4
dc.subject.lcshTrusten
dc.subject.lcshAuditing--Philosophyen
dc.titleTrust, audit, and public engagementen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities (SGSAH)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/817


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record