Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorZamorano-Abramson, José
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Lloreda, Mª Victoria
dc.contributor.authorColmenares, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorCall, Josep
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-15T00:54:28Z
dc.date.available2024-02-15T00:54:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-01
dc.identifier283264217
dc.identifierb95e5106-6a0c-4abc-95a3-89aca1e5a6c4
dc.identifier85148081938
dc.identifier.citationZamorano-Abramson , J , Hernández-Lloreda , M V , Colmenares , F & Call , J 2023 , ' Orcas remember what to copy : a deferred and interference-resistant imitation study ' , Animal Cognition , vol. 26 , pp. 1035-1048 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01756-3en
dc.identifier.issn1435-9448
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8597-8336/work/129147733
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29246
dc.descriptionFunding: This project was conducted at the Marineland Aquarium Antibes, France and supported by a Research Initiation Grant from the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development, FONDECYT no. 11201224 to J.Z.A.en
dc.description.abstractResponse facilitation has often been portrayed as a “low level” category of social learning, because the demonstrator’s action, which is already in the observer’s repertoire, automatically triggers that same action, rather than induces the learning of a new action. One way to rule out response facilitation consists of introducing a delay between the demonstrator’s behavior and the observer’s response to let their possible effects wear off. However, this may not rule out “delayed response facilitation” in which the subject could be continuously “mentally rehearsing” the demonstrated actions during the waiting period. We used a do-as-the-other-did paradigm in two orcas to study whether they displayed cognitive control regarding their production of familiar actions by (1) introducing a delay ranging from 60 to 150 s between observing and producing the actions and (2) interspersing distractor (non-target) actions performed by the demonstrator and by the subjects during the delay period. These two manipulations were aimed at preventing the mental rehearsal of the observed actions during the delay period. Both orcas copied the model’s target actions on command after various delay periods, and crucially, despite the presence of distractor actions. These findings suggest that orcas are capable of selectively retrieving a representation of an observed action to generate a delayed matching response. Moreover, these results lend further support to the proposal that the subjects’ performance relied not only on a mental representation of the specific actions that were requested to copy, but also flexibly on the abstract and domain general rule requested by the specific “copy command”. Our findings strengthen the view that orcas and other cetaceans are capable of flexible and controlled social learning.
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.extent740300
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Cognitionen
dc.subjectSocial learning mechanismsen
dc.subjectDeferred imitationen
dc.subjectCognitive controlen
dc.subjectCetacean cognitionen
dc.subjectOrcaen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.titleOrcas remember what to copy : a deferred and interference-resistant imitation studyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10071-023-01756-3
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2024-02-15


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record