Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorCrisp, Oliver
dc.contributor.advisorTorrance, Alan J.
dc.contributor.advisorRutledge, Jonathan C.
dc.contributor.authorBray, Dennis
dc.coverage.spatialvii, 171 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-06T12:23:41Z
dc.date.available2024-02-06T12:23:41Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29175
dc.description.abstractIn his magnum opus, ‘De Trinitate’, the twelfth century canon Richard of St. Victor offers sustained reflection on core dogmatic claims from the Athanasian creed. At the heart of the treatise is Richard’s argument for exactly three divine persons. Starting with the necessity of a single, maximally perfect divine substance, Richard reasons along four steps: (i) God must have maximal charity, or other-love; (ii) to be perfectly good, delightful, and glorious, God’s other-love must be shared among at least two, and (iii) among at least three, divine persons; (iv) the metaphysics of divine processions and love each ensure the impossibility of four divine persons. Scripture and trustworthy church authorities already give Richard certainty in these truths of faith. Even so, as an act of ardent love Richard contemplates on the Trinity as seen in creation. From this epistemic point of departure, he supports his conclusions from common human experience alone. Recently, philosophers of religion – such as Richard Swinburne, William Hasker, and William Lane Craig – have used Richard’s trinitarian reflection as a springboard for constructive work in apologetics and ramified natural theology. Additionally, medieval and Victorine scholars have increasingly recognized the novelty and rigour of Richard’s contribution to trinitarian philosophical-theology. However, to date there has been no dedicated study of the heart of Richard’s project in ‘De Trinitate’. In this thesis I offer an historically informed exposition of Richard’s argument for the necessity of the Trinity, as well as philosophically informed analysis. Further, I address some of the most pressing concerns with Richard’s argument. Richard’s work is not only suggestive, but highly compelling. If sound, it is situated to contribute to the contemporary philosophical and theological trinitarian discussion. I conclude by considering its application for (so called) Latin and Social, as well as heterodox, trinitarian theologies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectRichard of Saint Victoren
dc.subjectDoctrine of the Trinityen
dc.subjectCreedal trinitarianismen
dc.subjectDivine substanceen
dc.subjectDivine personsen
dc.subjectTriadic speculationen
dc.subjectNatural theologyen
dc.subjectArguments for the Trinityen
dc.subjectMetaphysics of the Trinityen
dc.subjectTrinitarian loveen
dc.subject.lccBT110.B82
dc.subject.lcshRichard, of St. Victor, -1173. De Trinitateen
dc.subject.lcshTrinityen
dc.titleRichard of St. Victor's argument for the necessity of the Trinity : an exposition and analysis of the argument for a tri-personal God in 'De Trinitate'en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2027-04-11
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 11th April 2027en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/737


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International