Files in this item
Horizons of hope : disability, eschatology, and the work of the Holy Spirit
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Davis, Aaron Brian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-22T14:30:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-22T14:30:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01-09 | |
dc.identifier | 297993065 | |
dc.identifier | cd8857d3-7bb1-4b0c-a395-3a0b17f4ca8e | |
dc.identifier | 85181704166 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Davis , A B 2024 , ' Horizons of hope : disability, eschatology, and the work of the Holy Spirit ' , Journal of Disability and Religion , vol. Latest Articles . https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2023.2301605 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2331-2521 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/29047 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper I propose a model of disability which synthesizes Amos Yong’s disability theology with Elizabeth Barnes’s “value-neutral model” of disability and then draws Sarah Coakley’s account of ante-mortem/post-mortem bodily fluidity in with both. To construct this model, I first outline Yong’s thought and then introduce Barnes’s work to it as a pivot point around which its eschatological imagery can turn. I then address Coakley’s work on bodily fluidity regarding gender and apply it to disability to reveal the model’s capacity to hold theological clarity and mystery in tension successfully. | |
dc.format.extent | 22 | |
dc.format.extent | 1489399 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Disability and Religion | en |
dc.subject | Difference | en |
dc.subject | Disability | en |
dc.subject | Eschatology | en |
dc.subject | Identity | en |
dc.subject | Value-neutral | en |
dc.subject | BL Religion | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | BL | en |
dc.title | Horizons of hope : disability, eschatology, and the work of the Holy Spirit | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Divinity | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/23312521.2023.2301605 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.