Files in this item
The time we experience : understanding the phenomenologies of temporal passage and presentness
Item metadata
dc.contributor.advisor | Prosser, Simon | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Keyu | |
dc.coverage.spatial | 80 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-19T14:46:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-19T14:46:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-06-10 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/29033 | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation explores what is involved in the alleged phenomenologies of the passage of time and the present, two phenomenological data that are normally cited to support the A-theory of time. It argues that the phenomenology corresponding to the purported passage phenomenology is that of dynamic changes in things’ states, and the phenomenology corresponding to the purported presentness phenomenology is that of (only) some things and events occurring simpliciter. It claims that these illusory phenomenologies are products of the feature of our perceptual experience of having a confined temporal horizon, which includes three aspects – limited access, involuntariness, and directionality. It also argues that the illusory phenomenologies of dynamic change and things and events occurring simpliciter, despite being at odds with the B-ontology, do not lend support to the A-theory of time. Furthermore, it provides insight into why our perceptual experience has a confined temporal horizon and how the intuitive beliefs that we experience temporal passage and presentness arise from the illusory phenomenologies. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject.lcc | BD638.C5 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Time--Philosophy | en |
dc.title | The time we experience : understanding the phenomenologies of temporal passage and presentness | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationname | MPhil Master of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | The University of St Andrews | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/702 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.