Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorKerr, Steven
dc.contributor.authorMillington, Tristan
dc.contributor.authorRudan, Igor
dc.contributor.authorMcCowan, Colin
dc.contributor.authorTibble, Holly
dc.contributor.authorJeffrey, Karen
dc.contributor.authorFagbamigbe, Adeniyi
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Colin R
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Chris
dc.contributor.authorHippisley-Cox, Julia
dc.contributor.authorSheikh, Aziz
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-17T10:30:10Z
dc.date.available2024-01-17T10:30:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.identifier294789150
dc.identifiercf4c9c17-44bd-40bc-aa73-80db0c1cb768
dc.identifier85181395513
dc.identifier.citationKerr , S , Millington , T , Rudan , I , McCowan , C , Tibble , H , Jeffrey , K , Fagbamigbe , A , Simpson , C R , Robertson , C , Hippisley-Cox , J & Sheikh , A 2023 , ' External validation of the QCovid 2 and 3 risk prediction algorithms for risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality in adults : national cohort study in Scotland ' , BMJ Open , vol. 13 , no. 12 , e075958 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075958en
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9466-833X/work/151190510
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/29023
dc.descriptionFunding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) following a commission by the Chief Medical Officer for England. EAVE II is funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_PC_19075) with the support of BREATHE: the Health Data Research Hub for Respiratory Health (MC_PC_19004), which is funded through the UK Research and Innovation Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund and delivered through Health Data Research UK. Additional support has been provided through Public Health Scotland and the Community Health and Social Care Directorate of the Scottish Government.en
dc.description.abstractObjective The QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms are risk prediction tools developed during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic that can be used to predict the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality, taking vaccination status into account. In this study, we assess their performance in Scotland. Methods We used the Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 national data platform consisting of individual-level data for the population of Scotland (5.4 million residents). Primary care data were linked to reverse-transcription PCR virology testing, hospitalisation and mortality data. We assessed the discrimination and calibration of the QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms in predicting COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths between 8 December 2020 and 15 June 2021. Results Our validation dataset comprised 465 058 individuals, aged 19–100. We found the following performance metrics (95% CIs) for QCovid 2 and 3: Harrell’s C 0.84 (0.82 to 0.86) for hospitalisation, and 0.92 (0.90 to 0.94) for death, observed-expected ratio of 0.24 for hospitalisation and 0.26 for death (ie, both the number of hospitalisations and the number of deaths were overestimated), and a Brier score of 0.0009 (0.00084 to 0.00096) for hospitalisation and 0.00036 (0.00032 to 0.0004) for death. Conclusions We found good discrimination of the QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms in Scotland, although performance was worse in higher age groups. Both the number of hospitalisations and the number of deaths were overestimated.
dc.format.extent8
dc.format.extent721293
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Openen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subjectE-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.titleExternal validation of the QCovid 2 and 3 risk prediction algorithms for risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality in adults : national cohort study in Scotlanden
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Sir James Mackenzie Institute for Early Diagnosisen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075958
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record