Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorPerry, John
dc.contributor.authorEverhart, D.T.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-21T10:30:01Z
dc.date.available2023-11-21T10:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-17
dc.identifier295553863
dc.identifierf3a1ae3b-7123-4aa3-9d8d-54eacaca3227
dc.identifier85176783379
dc.identifier.citationPerry , J & Everhart , D T 2023 , ' Ahead by a century ' , Modern Theology , vol. Early View . https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12908en
dc.identifier.issn0266-7177
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/28734
dc.description.abstractPaul Tyson's A Christian Theology of Science has convinced me that David Hume would not be able to affirm the Nicene Creed, though admittedly I didn't need much convincing. In fact, Tyson persuaded me of nearly all his claims about matters before, say, 1922. It is not as though I disagree with the rest, but that in telling the sweeping story of theology's fate in modernity—on which I agree with Tyson—he cuts off his story too soon: a hundred years ago, just when things were about to get exciting in theology again. If he had continued telling the story until today, his book would likely come to very different conclusions; my own conclusions, not coincidentally.1 My plan here is first, to summarize the book, second, to continue Tyson's own story but filling in the missing last century, and finally, to consider a few examples to show how Tyson's Christian theology of science could cash out in scientific practice.
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.extent107566
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofModern Theologyen
dc.subjectBL Religionen
dc.subject.lccBLen
dc.titleAhead by a centuryen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Divinityen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/moth.12908
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record