Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorEich, Sandro
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T14:30:01Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T14:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-31
dc.identifier295498422
dc.identifier3ed80c76-bda8-4ed7-a66c-cd4e14ec7cb9
dc.identifier.citationEich , S 2023 , ' “There is no alternative!”—the case for a co(n)temporary English fiction: Ian McEwan’s Machines Like Me and Jeanette Winterson’s Frankissstein ' , On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture , no. 15 . https://doi.org/10.22029/oc.2023.1360en
dc.identifier.issn2366-4142
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7987-6210/work/146010787
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/28609
dc.description.abstractThe future is the only form of temporal experience which requires us to use our speculative and imaginative capacities. However, due to the concurrent global challenges of the twenty-first century (COVID-19, populism and nationalism, climate crisis), imagining viable future scenarios for the human has become increasingly difficult. As a result, our Enlightenment conception of temporality as linear has become futile and requires an alternative approach. This article explores how two examples of contemporary English fiction, Ian McEwan’s Machines Like Me and Jeanette Winterson’s Frankissstein, experiment with temporally marked forms to construct narratives in which the separation into past, present, and future becomes indistinguishable. The technological imagination of these narratives, in the shape of accelerated scientific progress in artificial intelligence and transcendent consciousness, produces alternative histories in the hopes of modeling a new sense of futurity. In doing so, McEwan’s and Winterson’s novels assimilate binaries such as antiquitas and modernitas, human and post-human, and ultimately past, present, and future to showcase the productive potential of speculative formalism (Eyers). I argue that such a modeling of ‘co-temporality’ (Ruffel) places the contemporary novel’s capacity for cultural inquiry on the same epistemological level as that for scientific inquiry, enabling a conception of futurity detached from temporal linearity and the logic of progress.
dc.format.extent27
dc.format.extent302173
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOn_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Cultureen
dc.subjectAlternative historyen
dc.subjectFuturityen
dc.subjectLiterary formsen
dc.subjectTemporalityen
dc.subjectExperimenten
dc.subjectScienceen
dc.subjectReproductionen
dc.subjectPost-humanen
dc.subjectPR English literatureen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.subject.lccPRen
dc.title“There is no alternative!”—the case for a co(n)temporary English fiction: Ian McEwan’s Machines Like Me and Jeanette Winterson’s Frankisssteinen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. University of St Andrewsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Englishen
dc.identifier.doi10.22029/oc.2023.1360
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record