Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMichelson, Jared
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T10:30:12Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T10:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2024-07
dc.identifier294296509
dc.identifierd09bebb4-dced-4ebc-ab77-30bb3b27875a
dc.identifier85174242807
dc.identifier.citationMichelson , J 2024 , ' Theology and economy ‘after’ Barth ' , Modern Theology , vol. 40 , no. 3 , pp. 600-625 . https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12906en
dc.identifier.issn0266-7177
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/28551
dc.description.abstractThe relation of theology and economy is a perennial theological challenge. Many contemporary theologians' understanding of this challenge is shaped by Karl Barth's attempt to resolve a set of tensions problematising this relation inherited from figures like Kant and Feuerbach. Barth ‘identified’ God's decision to be God with God's decision to be human. Further, he inconsistently but insistently claimed that the ‘form’ in which God reveals Godself in the person of Jesus somewhat isomorphically corresponds to God in Godself. The brilliance and yet instability of Barth's approach spawned a number of construals of theology and economy which depart from him in significant ways. I label these contemporary trajectories the post-Barthian temptation, Barthian revisionism, Barthian Balthasarianism, and Barthian catholicism and critically evaluate them, suggesting that Barthian catholicism is the most promising.
dc.format.extent26
dc.format.extent158319
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofModern Theologyen
dc.subjectBV Practical Theologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBVen
dc.titleTheology and economy ‘after’ Barthen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Divinityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12906
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record