Files in this item
Theology and economy ‘after’ Barth
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Michelson, Jared | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-19T10:30:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-19T10:30:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-07 | |
dc.identifier | 294296509 | |
dc.identifier | d09bebb4-dced-4ebc-ab77-30bb3b27875a | |
dc.identifier | 85174242807 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Michelson , J 2024 , ' Theology and economy ‘after’ Barth ' , Modern Theology , vol. 40 , no. 3 , pp. 600-625 . https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12906 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0266-7177 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/28551 | |
dc.description.abstract | The relation of theology and economy is a perennial theological challenge. Many contemporary theologians' understanding of this challenge is shaped by Karl Barth's attempt to resolve a set of tensions problematising this relation inherited from figures like Kant and Feuerbach. Barth ‘identified’ God's decision to be God with God's decision to be human. Further, he inconsistently but insistently claimed that the ‘form’ in which God reveals Godself in the person of Jesus somewhat isomorphically corresponds to God in Godself. The brilliance and yet instability of Barth's approach spawned a number of construals of theology and economy which depart from him in significant ways. I label these contemporary trajectories the post-Barthian temptation, Barthian revisionism, Barthian Balthasarianism, and Barthian catholicism and critically evaluate them, suggesting that Barthian catholicism is the most promising. | |
dc.format.extent | 26 | |
dc.format.extent | 158319 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Modern Theology | en |
dc.subject | BV Practical Theology | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | BV | en |
dc.title | Theology and economy ‘after’ Barth | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Divinity | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12906 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.