Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBlakeway, Amy Louise
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-10T23:35:28Z
dc.date.available2023-10-10T23:35:28Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.identifier266265284
dc.identifier9faf0a41-15a5-4566-920f-537ce2340e7b
dc.identifier85116822879
dc.identifier000715124200004
dc.identifier.citationBlakeway , A L 2021 , ' Reassessing the Scottish Parliamentary Records, 1528-1548 : manuscript, print, bureaucracy and royal authority ' , Parliamentary History , vol. 40 , no. 3 , pp. 417-422 . https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12583en
dc.identifier.issn0264-2824
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:A46098A037DB113C7FBA7EF8F1F35CF0
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:A46098A037DB113C7FBA7EF8F1F35CF0
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6202-9947/work/107287315
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/28522
dc.description.abstractThis article for the first time correctly identifies a manuscript previously identified as an ‘official record of parliament’ as a draft of the first printed statutes of the Scottish Parliament, the Actis and Constitutionis of 1542. This discovery has a number of implications for our study of parliament in the period 1528 to 1548, encompassing the personal rule of James V and the beginning of his daughter, Mary Queen of Scots's, minority, which the original manuscript covered. Careful attention to these materials exposes a sophisticated administrative culture, characterised by reviewing and repromulgating statutes, as well as revealing the ghosts of further, now lost, records. Considering the printed text, meanwhile, suggests that parliament and the law played as important a role as history and ceremonial in the assertion of James V's kingship in the years 1540–2: indeed, this should not surprise us given that James's administrators were also his poets. While the Actis of 1542 have hitherto provoked little interest from among historians, they emerge as an important influence on the much better known publication of Scottish statutes from James I to Mary in 1567. The administrators who produced this later volume evidently saw themselves as working within the same tradition as their predecessors of 1542: an increased appreciation of the administrative expertise, careful record-keeping, attention to the dissemination of statute and the ways in which this bolstered the power of the crown suggests that we ought to do likewise.
dc.format.extent26
dc.format.extent440676
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofParliamentary Historyen
dc.subjectJames Foulis, clerk registeren
dc.subjectJames V, king of Scots 1513–42en
dc.subjectMary, queen of Scots, 1542–87en
dc.subjectParliamenten
dc.subjectPublic administrationen
dc.subjectStatutesen
dc.subjectTreasonen
dc.subjectCD921 Archivesen
dc.subjectDA Great Britainen
dc.subjectJN1187 Scotlanden
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectBDUen
dc.subjectACen
dc.subject.lccCD921en
dc.subject.lccDAen
dc.subject.lccJN1187en
dc.titleReassessing the Scottish Parliamentary Records, 1528-1548 : manuscript, print, bureaucracy and royal authorityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1750-0206.12583
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2023-10-11


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record