Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHampson, Margaret
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-09T23:36:40Z
dc.date.available2023-09-09T23:36:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-10
dc.identifier275776064
dc.identifierbcb8f283-3e90-4414-8fcc-b48525530756
dc.identifier85087990981
dc.identifier000851209500001
dc.identifier.citationHampson , M 2022 , ' The learner's motivation and the structure of habituation in Aristotle ' , Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie , vol. 104 , no. 3 , pp. 415-447 . https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2019-0053en
dc.identifier.issn0003-9101
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5097-6405/work/99804779
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/28339
dc.description.abstractMoral virtue is, for Aristotle, a state to which an agent’s motivation is central. For anyone interested in Aristotle’s account of moral development this invites reflection on two questions: how is it that virtuous motivational dispositions are established? And what contribution do the moral learner’s existing motivational states make to the success of her habituation? I argue that views which demand that the learner act with virtuous motives if she is to acquire virtuous dispositions misconstrue the nature and structure of the habituation process, but also obscure Aristotle’s crucial insight that the very practice of virtuous actions affords a certain discovery and can be transformative of an agent’s motivational states. Drawing attention, in Aristotle’s account, to an asymmetry between the agential perspective and the observation of others, I consider what the agential perspective affords the learner, and offer a novel interpretation of the role a learner’s existing motives play in her habituation.
dc.format.extent33
dc.format.extent248115
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofArchiv für Geschichte der Philosophieen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleThe learner's motivation and the structure of habituation in Aristotleen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/agph-2019-0053
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2023-09-10


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record