Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHolmes, Stephen R.
dc.contributor.authorBakker, Martin H.
dc.coverage.spatial264en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T13:41:52Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T13:41:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/28296
dc.description.abstractA variety of studies describe and explain the development of the ways in which the relationship between faith and assurance is viewed within the Reformed tradition. Attempts have been made to try to lessen the severity of the Reformers’ position on the inseparability of faith and assurance, to defend the segregation in time and sequence of the different aspects of faith, to argue that differing contexts warranted a change in emphasis, or to blame orthodox theology on God’s sovereignty for a perceived lack of assurance. Our approach is different as we identify opposing pneumatological views as the underlying cause for the epistemological separation of faith and assurance so common among later Reformed theologians. First, we demonstrate that most Reformers believe that an initial measure of subjective assurance is an integral part of the Holy Spirit’s gift of faith, imparted at regeneration, through the Spirit’s immediate witness. It is for this reason that the dominant Reformation position is that personal assurance is of the essence of saving faith. Second, we show that the Puritan and Covenanter Samuel Rutherford departs in substance from most Reformers in several ways. Crucially, Rutherford rejects the Spirit’s direct testimony as determinative in the gaining of assurance. In Rutherford’s theology, the Holy Spirit gifts the ability to believe rather than gifting fiducial faith. Contrary to most Reformers, Rutherford makes the distinction between objective and subjective assurance, thereby still allowing the assertion that (objective) assurance is of the essence of saving faith. Consequently, Rutherford departs from most Reformers by employing works to gain assurance rather than to confirm assurance. In other words, Rutherford exhorts people to pursue the personal experience of salvation by good works from a position of uncertainty, rather than encouraging people to do good works from a position of personal assurance.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAssuranceen_US
dc.subjectAssurance of faithen_US
dc.subjectAssurance of salvationen_US
dc.subjectCertainty of faithen_US
dc.subjectGift of faithen_US
dc.subjectHoly Spirit's gift of faithen_US
dc.subjectEssence of faithen_US
dc.subjectObjective assuranceen_US
dc.subjectSubjective assuranceen_US
dc.subjectEpistemology of faith and assuranceen_US
dc.subjectGood worksen_US
dc.subjectGaining assuranceen_US
dc.subjectStrengthening assuranceen_US
dc.subjectReformation theologyen_US
dc.subjectPneumatologyen_US
dc.subjectHistorical theologyen_US
dc.subjectReformed theologyen_US
dc.subjectPuritan theologyen_US
dc.subjectScottish theologyen_US
dc.subjectSystematic theologyen_US
dc.subjectCalvin vs Calvinismen_US
dc.subjectPurpose of good works in faith and assuranceen_US
dc.subjectInseparability of faith and assuranceen_US
dc.subjectNature of faith and assuranceen_US
dc.subjectJoel Beekeen_US
dc.subjectRobert Lethamen_US
dc.subjectAnthony Laneen_US
dc.subjectCornelis Graaflanden_US
dc.subjectRichard Mulleren_US
dc.subjectCalvinen_US
dc.subjectHeinrich Bullingeren_US
dc.subjectHuldrych Zwinglien_US
dc.subjectOecolampadiusen_US
dc.subjectMartin Buceren_US
dc.subjectCapitoen_US
dc.subjectWolfgang Musculusen_US
dc.subjectPeter Martyr Vermiglien_US
dc.subjectTheodore Bezaen_US
dc.subjectWilliam Cunninghamen_US
dc.subjectThomas Torranceen_US
dc.subjectR. T. Kendallen_US
dc.subjectCharles Bellen_US
dc.subjectPaul Helmen_US
dc.subjectGrounds for assuranceen_US
dc.subjectPractical syllogismen_US
dc.subjectJohn Coffeyen_US
dc.subjectGuy Richarden_US
dc.subjectCovenant theologyen_US
dc.subjectHabit of faithen_US
dc.subjectWestminster Confessionen_US
dc.subjectExperience of salvationen_US
dc.subjectDavid Dicksonen_US
dc.subjectJames Durhamen_US
dc.subjectGeorge Gillespieen_US
dc.subjectWilliam Guthrieen_US
dc.subjectJames Fraser of Breaen_US
dc.subjectHerman Bavincken_US
dc.subject.lccBX9225.R94Z5B2
dc.subject.lcshRutherford, Samuel, 1600-1661en
dc.subject.lcshAssurance (Theology)--History of doctrinesen
dc.subject.lcshFaithen
dc.subject.lcshTheology, Doctrinal--Historyen
dc.subject.lcshReformationen
dc.titleErosion of the Holy Spirit's gift of faith and assurance : Samuel Rutherford's departure from the Reformationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2028-09-01
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 1st September 2028en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/599


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record