Canberra planning for gender kinds
MetadataShow full item record
In this paper I argue that the Canberra Plan is ill-equipped to offer a satisfactory theory of gender. Insofar as the Canberra Plan aims to provide a general and unified approach to philosophical theorising, this is a significant problem. I argue that this deficit in their method stems from the robust role assigned to pre-theoretical beliefs in constructing philosophical analyses. I utilise a critical conception of ideology to explain why our pre-theoretic beliefs about certain social kinds are likely to deliver politically dubious metaphysics of the social world. The first half of the paper is dedicated to exercising this theoretical shortcoming. In the second half, I suggest a way in which the Canberra Plan can address and rectify this problem, with a view to maintaining the theoretical viability of the Canberra Plan with respect to politically important concepts.
Fletcher , J 2023 , ' Canberra planning for gender kinds ' , Journal of Social Ontology , vol. 9 , no. 1 , pp. 1-25 . https://doi.org/10.25365/jso-2023-7116
Journal of Social Ontology
Copyright (c) 2023 Jade Fletcher. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.