Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorNevader, Madhavi
dc.contributor.authorWalton, Jonathan Harvey
dc.coverage.spatial195en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-02T11:43:14Z
dc.date.available2023-06-02T11:43:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27738
dc.description.abstractThis thesis argues that the theological interpretation of Genesis 2–4, which describes a pristine world corrupted by evil, derives from a cosmological model and accompanying ideas of what constitutes goodness and badness that is anachronistic to the original context of the Hebrew Bible and instead arises from the reception of the material in the Hellenistic period. By comparing ideas and images from ancient Near Eastern literature that resemble those appearing in Genesis, we argue that Genesis presents a cosmology and system of values wherein an eternally pre-existing undesirable state of negation (“chaos”) is pushed to the periphery of a manufactured desirable condition of order and harmony, which in turn is threatened by an undesirable corruption from within (“evil”) and thereby under constant threat of collapsing back into nothingness unless perpetually sustained by the combined efforts of humans and gods. Within this cosmology and axiology, which is shared with the literature of the ancient Near East, Genesis presents a subversive narrative that discusses where true order in the world might be found. We argue that the Primordial History provides a deconstruction of various institutions of order found throughout the rest of the ancient Near East, especially those favoured by Israel’s Babylonian conquerors, in order to promote the Israelite covenant with Yahweh as the desirable alternative. Each institution in turn is presented as valuable and useful yet also insufficient to produce and sustain order. The pericope of Genesis 2–4—"the account of the heavens and the earth”—deconstructs the institutions of agriculture and civilization, specifically by demonstrating that, in contrast to the presentation of comparative literature, their acquisition is insufficient to elevate humans out of a state of negation, and further demonstrating that the pursuit of cultural achievement is insufficient to produce the nearest possible human approximation of eternal life.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectGenesisen_US
dc.subjectBibleen_US
dc.subjectSinen_US
dc.subjectTheodicyen_US
dc.subjectChaosen_US
dc.subjectMesopotamiaen_US
dc.subjectBabylonen_US
dc.subjectEgypten_US
dc.subjectGilgameshen_US
dc.subjectAtrahasisen_US
dc.subjectAdapaen_US
dc.subjectTheologyen_US
dc.subjectCovenanten_US
dc.subjectValueen_US
dc.subjectAxiologyen_US
dc.subjectCosmologyen_US
dc.subjectCosmogonyen_US
dc.subjectAnthropogonyen_US
dc.subjectJudaismen_US
dc.subjectHebrewen_US
dc.subjectDualismen_US
dc.subjectEdenen_US
dc.subjectOrderen_US
dc.subjectAdamen_US
dc.subjectEveen_US
dc.subjectCainen_US
dc.subjectChaoskampfen_US
dc.subjectGooden_US
dc.subjectEvilen_US
dc.subjectAssyriaen_US
dc.subjectHittiteen_US
dc.subjectIsraelen_US
dc.subjectMythologyen_US
dc.subject.lccBS1235.52W26
dc.subject.lcshBible. Genesis--Criticism, interpretation, etc.en
dc.subject.lcshSin--Christianityen
dc.subject.lcshTheodicyen
dc.subject.lcshBiblical cosmologyen
dc.titleKnowing good and evil : values and presentation in Genesis 2–4en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/491


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record