Files in this item
Nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation : assessing the Scottish Public's preferences for saltmarsh carbon storage
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Riegel, Simone | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuhfuss, Laure | |
dc.contributor.author | Stojanovic, Timothy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-31T10:30:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-31T10:30:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Riegel , S , Kuhfuss , L & Stojanovic , T 2023 , ' Nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation : assessing the Scottish Public's preferences for saltmarsh carbon storage ' , Ecological Economics , vol. 211 , 107863 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107863 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0921-8009 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 286930435 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 598925a6-1c23-4d71-9d9b-d08d73bbe417 | |
dc.identifier.other | RIS: urn:6393EE4112622BEAA4101FC452985CF2 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-8936-2299/work/136288769 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85160564415 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10023/27706 | |
dc.description | Funding: This work was supported by Marine Scotland – Scottish Government through the Scottish Blue Carbon Forum. | en |
dc.description.abstract | The saltmarsh carbon storage potential is a key topic in blue carbon research and climate policy. Ecosystem service valuations provide valuable information to policymakers for habitat management and climate change mitigation policies. Yet, only few saltmarsh valuation studies have included the carbon storage service in the UK context. This paper investigates how the public values saltmarsh ecosystem services, focussing on the carbon storage service. We used a choice experiment to elicit the willingness to pay (WTP) of a representative sample of the Scottish public to support interventions that would maintain or improve the provision of these services. Furthermore, we tested the effect of information on individuals' preferences and WTP with a split sample approach where one group received a treatment in the form of additional information. We found that (i) all attributes had a significant influence on individuals' choices; (ii) both groups had, on average, a positive marginal WTP for all presented ecosystem services; (iii) the treated sample had, on average, no significantly different marginal WTP for carbon storage than the control group. This paper adds to the limited literature on the saltmarsh carbon storage ecosystem service and demonstrates a developed nation's public's openness to nature-based climate change mitigation solutions. | |
dc.format.extent | 14 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ecological Economics | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en |
dc.subject | Valuation | en |
dc.subject | Choice experiment | en |
dc.subject | Blue carbon | en |
dc.subject | Saltmarshes | en |
dc.subject | Ecosystem services | en |
dc.subject | Climate Change Mitigation | en |
dc.subject | E-DAS | en |
dc.subject | SDG 13 - Climate Action | en |
dc.subject | MCC | en |
dc.title | Nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation : assessing the Scottish Public's preferences for saltmarsh carbon storage | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Development | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Institute | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Geographies of Sustainability, Society, Inequalities and Possibilities | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Coastal Resources Management Group | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107863 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.