Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorArandelovic, Oggie
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-15T15:30:22Z
dc.date.available2023-05-15T15:30:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-01
dc.identifier285800526
dc.identifierc59b33aa-589d-4ea6-819b-c53c66d72612
dc.identifier85160406511
dc.identifier.citationArandelovic , O 2023 , ' Caveat medicus : it's time to re-think stratification, you may not be helping ' , Biomarkers Insights , vol. 18 . https://doi.org/10.1177/11772719231174746en
dc.identifier.issn1177-2719
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27622
dc.description.abstractBackground The focus of the present Letter is on the large and seemingly fertile body of work captured under the umbrella of ‘patient stratification’. Objectives I identify and explain a fundamental methodological flaw underlying the manner in which the development of an increasingly large number of new stratification strategies is approached. Design I show an inherent conflict between the assumptions made, and the very purpose of stratification and its application in practice. Methods I analyse the methodological underpinnings of stratification as presently done and draw parallels with conceptually similarly flawed precedents which are now widely recognized. Results The highlighted flaw is shown to undermine the overarching ultimate goal of improved patient outcomes by undue fixation on an ill-founded proxy. Conclusion I issue a call for a re-think of the problem and the processes leading to the adoption of new stratification strategies in the clinic.
dc.format.extent3
dc.format.extent230744
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiomarkers Insightsen
dc.subjectRisken
dc.subjectBiomarkersen
dc.subjectPersonalizeden
dc.subjectTargeteden
dc.subjectPrecisionen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.titleCaveat medicus : it's time to re-think stratification, you may not be helpingen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Computer Scienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/11772719231174746
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record