Files in this item
Public preferences for wind, fracking and nuclear energy in England and Scotland : a choice experiment approach
Item metadata
dc.contributor.advisor | Warren, Charles | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hanley, Nick | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Borger, Tobias | |
dc.contributor.author | Almeziad, Deema | |
dc.coverage.spatial | 229 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-11T10:45:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-11T10:45:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-11-29 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/27382 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study assesses public preferences for alternative electricity generation technologies in England and Scotland, in the context of the global challenge of climate change and the current policy debate in the UK. Specifically, the study aims to provide an insight into the factors that could potentially influence the acceptability of four energy sources (onshore wind, offshore wind, fracking and nuclear energy). The preference heterogeneity is then examined with regard to observable and unobservable factors (socio-demographic and place of residence characteristics, and environmental attitudes). The choice experiment method is employed in this research to elicit preferences for future energy policy targeting environmental and climate change conditions. Through an online survey, data are collected and completed by 986 respondents residing in England and Scotland. Three choice modelling techniques are used for analysis: multinomial and mixed logit models; latent class model; and hybrid mixed model. The results show a significantly positive willingness to pay for both onshore and offshore wind energy technologies and a significantly negative willingness to pay for fracking and nuclear energy. These general results are however heterogeneous and depend to a certain extent on sociodemographic characteristics, especially age, education, income and environmental organisation membership. Furthermore, environmental attitudes (considered as three dimensions: cognitive, affective and behavioural) toward the environment and climate change emerge as significant predictors of energy sources preferences. The results also show that English and Scottish public preferences need not be considered separately, as most of the differences between them are not statistically significant. Overall, the findings of this research are useful for designing optimal future energy and climate change policies, as well as raising the public acceptability for the development of alternative energy projects in England and Scotland. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Public preferences | en_US |
dc.subject | Willingness to pay | en_US |
dc.subject | Energy sources | en_US |
dc.subject | Wind energy | en_US |
dc.subject | Wind energy | en_US |
dc.subject | Wind energy | en_US |
dc.subject | Choice experiment | en_US |
dc.subject | Choice modelling | en_US |
dc.subject.lcc | TJ807.G7A6 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Renewable energy sources--Great Britain | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Energy policy--Citizen participation--Great Britain | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Wind power--Great Britain | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Hydraulic fracturing--Great Britain | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Nuclear energy--Great Britain | en |
dc.title | Public preferences for wind, fracking and nuclear energy in England and Scotland : a choice experiment approach | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.publisher.institution | The University of St Andrews | en_US |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2023-11-08 | |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Thesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Restricted until 8th November 2023 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/394 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.