Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, António M. M.
dc.contributor.authorBarker, Jessica L.
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Elva J. H.
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-30T10:30:06Z
dc.date.available2023-03-30T10:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-10
dc.identifier283628431
dc.identifier2ec84bb2-cc48-495f-ade4-e36760c3467e
dc.identifier85148405628
dc.identifier.citationRodrigues , A M M , Barker , J L & Robinson , E J H 2023 , ' The evolution of intergroup cooperation ' , Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , vol. 378 , no. 1874 , 20220074 . https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0074en
dc.identifier.issn0962-8436
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 930028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27295
dc.description.abstractSociality is widespread among animals, and involves complex relationships within and between social groups. While intragroup interactions are often cooperative, intergroup interactions typically involve conflict, or at best tolerance. Active cooperation between members of distinct, separate groups occurs very rarely, predominantly in some primate and ant species. Here, we ask why intergroup cooperation is so rare, and what conditions favour its evolution. We present a model incorporating intra- and intergroup relationships and local and long-distance dispersal. We show that dispersal modes play a pivotal role in the evolution of intergroup interactions. Both long-distance and local dispersal processes drive population social structure, and the costs and benefits of intergroup conflict, tolerance and cooperation. Overall, the evolution of multi-group interaction patterns, including both intergroup aggression and intergroup tolerance, or even altruism, is more likely with mostly localized dispersal. However, the evolution of these intergroup relationships may have significant ecological impacts, and this feedback may alter the ecological conditions that favour its own evolution. These results show that the evolution of intergroup cooperation is favoured by a specific set of conditions, and may not be evolutionarily stable. We discuss how our results relate to empirical evidence of intergroup cooperation in ants and primates.
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent1041480
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciencesen
dc.subjectIntergroup cooperationen
dc.subjectCoalitionsen
dc.subjectKin selectionen
dc.subjectPeaceen
dc.subjectDispersalen
dc.subjectIntergroup conflicten
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectACen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.titleThe evolution of intergroup cooperationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rstb.2022.0074
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/195431/en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record