Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorProsser, Simon
dc.contributor.authorGuarrasi, Guglielmo
dc.coverage.spatial129en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T09:26:49Z
dc.date.available2023-03-28T09:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/27275
dc.description.abstractSelf-deception is a tricky phenomenon to define, especially once we realise the further complications its interaction with introspection might lead to. In this dissertation I am to analyse these two phenomena to show their compatibility. In fact, I am going to argue that, although self-deception is an instance where introspection fails whereas the latter can cause the end of a self-deceive state, no problematic interference happens between them. To reach this aim I am going to rely on the studies conducted by Nisbett and Wilson on instances where subjects fail to introspect certain mental states or processes. I will use this to argue that it is then possible for a subject to fail to introspect certain aspects of their mental life and, thusly, self-deceive. In turn, I am going to show how having areas where introspecting gives us the wrong result is not a major problem as it is a characteristic it shares with sense perception, which is something we are used to rely on.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy of minden_US
dc.subjectIntrospectionen_US
dc.subjectSelf-deceptionen_US
dc.subjectKnowing ourselvesen_US
dc.subjectConsciousnessen_US
dc.subjectIrrationalityen_US
dc.titleSelf-deception and its interaction with introspectionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelMastersen_US
dc.type.qualificationnameMPhil Master of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/sta/371


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record