Files in this item
SISP as practice : de-isolating SISP activity across multiple levels
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, Jeffrey | |
dc.contributor.author | McDonagh, Joe | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-08T00:41:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-08T00:41:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-06-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hughes , J & McDonagh , J 2021 , ' SISP as practice : de-isolating SISP activity across multiple levels ' , Journal of Strategic Information Systems , vol. 30 , no. 2 , 101658 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101658 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0963-8687 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 273230802 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: d89f5a67-997b-426b-a4df-571ff5057b13 | |
dc.identifier.other | WOS: 000661142600002 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85102046408 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/27121 | |
dc.description.abstract | The strategic information systems planning (SISP) literature has retained a narrow focus on organizational level activity to date. Limited empirical research has explored SISP’s multi-level interlinkages and complexities. Studies that have attempted to explore the micro activity of strategizing via a practice-based perspective have had their significance to academic and practitioner audiences questioned on grounds of micro-isolationism. Using a strategy as practice (SAP) lens, this study investigates how senior managers practice SISP through case studies of two public sector organizations (PSOs). The research’s primary contribution is a multi-level framework representing the practice of SISP. We ‘de-isolate’ SISP activity by empirically revealing how it is linked across macro, meso, and micro levels by SISP’s practitioners. Relating seemingly mundane strategic activity to matters of consequence has proven an enduring issue. Yet, at a time when organizations are facing grand challenges of increasing frequency and scale, we argue that the situating of day-to-day information systems (IS) strategy work within its broader context has never been more important. We propose a future research agenda premised upon moving ‘upstream’ to position SISP relative to grand challenges and ‘downstream’ to capture more open and inclusive forms of SISP. | |
dc.format.extent | 14 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Strategic Information Systems | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101658 | en |
dc.subject | Strategic information systems planning | en |
dc.subject | Strategy as practice | en |
dc.subject | Micro-isolationism | en |
dc.subject | Grand challenges | en |
dc.subject | Open strategy | en |
dc.subject | T Technology (General) | en |
dc.subject | 3rd-DAS | en |
dc.subject | AC | en |
dc.subject | MCC | en |
dc.subject.lcc | T1 | en |
dc.title | SISP as practice : de-isolating SISP activity across multiple levels | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Postprint | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Management | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Office of the Principal | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101658 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.embargoedUntil | 2023-03-08 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.