Files in this item
Rush job : slavery and brevity in the early Roman principate
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Geue, Tom | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-16T15:30:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-16T15:30:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Geue , T 2022 , ' Rush job : slavery and brevity in the early Roman principate ' , Cambridge Classical Journal , vol. 68 , pp. 83 - 111 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1750270522000082 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1750-2705 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 279435937 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 24c4e9ad-0607-45a5-97e5-7fb12b765fe0 | |
dc.identifier.other | RIS: urn:279450CA91E41E3A747E346AD3208E39 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-0148-3393/work/112711476 | |
dc.identifier.other | WOS: 000792149600001 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85142268700 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/26997 | |
dc.description.abstract | The upswing in brief forms of literature in the early Roman principate is marked. From Ovid to Velleius Paterculus, Phaedrus to Valerius Maximus, this aesthetic trend seems to transcend genre. Such a phenomenon has thus far been understood as arising from either the pressures of literary tradition or the transformations in the organisation of elite knowledge. This article disagrees. It posits a new prospective causality behind the eruption in brevity, namely the state of slavery and its time-conscious way of being in the world. The article performs a close comparative reading of Phaedrus’ Fables alongside Velleius Paterculus’ Compendium of Roman History to show how brevity and its suspension can be understood as formal constraints, acts of service and redemptive aesthetic coping modes – all determined by the historical conditions of enslavement. It concludes with a coda on the general association of poetry with bondage and constraint in the late Republic and early Empire. | |
dc.format.extent | 29 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cambridge Classical Journal | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Cambridge Philological Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited | en |
dc.subject | PA Classical philology | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject | AC | en |
dc.subject | MCC | en |
dc.subject.lcc | PA | en |
dc.title | Rush job : slavery and brevity in the early Roman principate | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for the Literatures of the Roman Empire | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Classics | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/S1750270522000082 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.