Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorGorska, Paulina
dc.contributor.authorTausch, Nicole
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T17:30:02Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T17:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-02
dc.identifier.citationGorska , P & Tausch , N 2022 , ' Dynamic, yet stable : separating within- and between-person components of collective action in support of a disadvantaged outgroup and its antecedents ' , Social Psychological and Personality Science , vol. OnlineFirst . https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221133882en
dc.identifier.issn1948-5514
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 281616336
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: d78f6911-1cb0-4ecd-aa87-531ce1dae2fd
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9471-0673/work/124889275
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85143848027
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/26823
dc.descriptionPreparation of this manuscript was supported by the National Science Centre Poland (Opus Grant [2017/25/B/HS6/01116] and Harmonia Grant [2017/26/M/HS6/00689]).en
dc.description.abstractDespite an increasing interest in the drivers of intergroup solidarity, the within-person longitudinal relationships between advantaged group members’ engagement for disadvantaged groups and its postulated antecedents remain scarcely tested. In the context of the refugee crisis following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, we conducted a three-wave longitudinal survey (NT1 = 804, NT2 = 702, and NT3 = 624) assessing Poles’ (the advantaged group) willingness to act for Ukrainians (the disadvantaged group), together with three hypothesized predictors—moral convictions, intergroup contact, and politicized identity. Employing a random intercept cross-lagged panel model that separates between- from within-person variance, we found that within-person changes in moral convictions and friendship contact directly predicted subsequent action intentions. Contrary to past theorizing, politicized identity emerged as consequence rather than an antecedent of collective action. Superficial intergroup contact indirectly predicted engagement intentions by facilitating cross-group friendship. We discuss the implications of our findings for current models of collective action.
dc.format.extent13
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Psychological and Personality Scienceen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221133882en
dc.subjectCollective action for a disadvantaged groupen
dc.subjectPoliticized identityen
dc.subjectMoral convictionsen
dc.subjectIntergroup contacten
dc.subjectLongitudinal methodologyen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectMCPen
dc.subjectACen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleDynamic, yet stable : separating within- and between-person components of collective action in support of a disadvantaged outgroup and its antecedentsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221133882
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record