Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorNiven, Ailsa
dc.contributor.authorAinge, James A.
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Mary
dc.contributor.authorGorely, Trish
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Paul
dc.contributor.authorOzakinci, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorRyde, Gemma C.
dc.contributor.authorTomaz, Simone A.
dc.contributor.authorWarne, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorWhiteford, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, Carl
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-20T17:30:07Z
dc.date.available2023-01-20T17:30:07Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-04
dc.identifier283034781
dc.identifier508ca7dd-4b7a-49aa-a387-dfb0dde2846e
dc.identifier000914809400001
dc.identifier85146468479
dc.identifier.citationNiven , A , Ainge , J A , Allison , M , Gorely , T , Kelly , P , Ozakinci , G , Ryde , G C , Tomaz , S A , Warne , S , Whiteford , V & Greenwood , C 2023 , ' Building partnerships : a case study of physical activity researchers and practitioners collaborating to build evidence to inform the delivery of a workplace step count challenge ' , Frontiers in Sports and Active living , vol. 4 , 1067127 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1067127en
dc.identifier.issn2624-9367
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 845118
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2456-5896/work/127065400
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-0007-1533/work/127065485
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5869-3274/work/127065896
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26805
dc.descriptionFunding: MA and SW have both received ESRC SGSSS PhD Collaborative studentships, where additional funding has been provided by Paths for All. AN has been funded by an University of Edinburgh CAHSS Knowledge Exchange grant.en
dc.description.abstractBackground : Walking is an integral part of Scotland's National Physical Activity Strategy, and the charity Paths for All's Workplace Step Count Challenge is a flagship programme within this strategy to promote physical activity. Effectively promoting physical activity requires collaborative engagement between stakeholders. However, there is limited guidance on how to do this. The aim of this case study is to share an example of a partnership between Paths for All and researchers to inform the development and delivery of the Workplace Step Count Challenge. Method : An overview of the partnership, example activities, reflections on opportunities and challenges, and suggestions for future partnership working are considered. Results : The partnership has evolved and strengthened over time through building trust. Many of the research activities provide an evidence base for the intervention. This work is mutually beneficial providing support for the work of the organisation, and opportunities for researchers to undertake “real world” research, leading to formal outputs and funding. The “real world” nature is challenging to integrate the most robust research designs. Recommendations for developing future partnerships were identified. Conclusion : Promoting physical activity effectively requires partnership working, and this paper provides insight into how such partnerships can work to inform future collaborations.
dc.format.extent8
dc.format.extent2651031
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Sports and Active livingen
dc.subjectSports and Active Livingen
dc.subjectWorksiteen
dc.subjectEvaluationen
dc.subjectInterventionen
dc.subjectScotlanden
dc.subjectCollaborationen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectMCCen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleBuilding partnerships : a case study of physical activity researchers and practitioners collaborating to build evidence to inform the delivery of a workplace step count challengeen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Organic Semiconductor Centreen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1067127
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record